SCIENCE ARTICLE
Changing demand across skill levels in EU labor market: when production goes global and assets go intangible
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2026-01-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-02-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-04-15
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-22
 
 
Publication date: 2026-05-15
 
 
Corresponding author
Karina Stelmakh   

Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
 
 
Management 2026;(1):470-494
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
F16
J31
O33
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose:
The ongoing integration of global production networks and the rising significance of intangible assets are fundamentally transforming the competitive landscape and organizational structures of European firms. These changes have heightened concerns about workforce polarization, especially the shrinking opportunities for low-skilled labor, as firms increasingly focus on knowledge, innovation, and participation in global value chains. The literature emphasizes the dual role of intangible assets and offshoring in driving both strategic change and growing employment inequality among different skill groups. This study examines how the internationalization of production and investments in intangible assets affect employment distribution among high-, medium-, and low-skilled workers in enterprises across CEE-11 and EU-15 countries.

Design/methodology/approach:
Employment share equations for low-, medium-, and high-skilled labor are estimated using Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) techniques, with model specification derived from the translog cost function. Using a balanced panel dataset for CEE-11 and EU-15 countries, this method allows for the identification of group-specific effects of offshoring and detailed intangible asset investment on skill-specific employment structures.

Findings:
The results show that offshoring consistently increases the share of high-skilled labor in both regions, but its displacement effects vary: in CEE-11 countries, offshoring significantly reduces low-skilled employment, while in EU-15 countries, it mainly displaces medium-skilled workers. Intangible capital further speeds up workforce polarization by disadvantaging low-skilled workers and benefiting those with higher skills. These patterns highlight the need for reskilling initiatives and flexible talent management to stay competitive in a changing labor market.

Value added and limitations:
These findings highlight the importance of reskilling initiatives and flexible talent management for maintaining competitiveness in a changing labor market. The analysis is limited by using aggregate country group data and available indicators for skills and intangible assets. Future research should address these limitations by investigating sector- and occupation-specific effects and further distinguishing between types of offshoring to gain deeper insights into labor market transformation.
REFERENCES (33)
1.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716.
 
2.
Aldieri, L., Makkonen, T., & Vinci, C. P. (2021). Spoils of innovation? Employment effects of R&D and knowledge spillovers in Finland. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(4), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/104385....
 
3.
Amiti, M., & Wei, S. (2009). Service offshoring and productivity: Evidence from the US. World Economy, 32(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
 
4.
Antonelli, C., Orsatti, G., & Pialli, G. (2025). The capital-saving, intangible, and skill-intensive direction of technological change in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/104385....
 
5.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
 
6.
Beno, M., & Caganova, D. (2025). o-Workers’ vs. e-Workers’ perceptions of job performance: Evidence from Austrian service professionals. Management, 29(1), 649-664. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/2....
 
7.
Bontadini, F., Corrado, C., Haskel, J., Iommi, M., & Jona-Lasinio, C. (2023). EUKLEMS & INTANProd: Industry productivity accounts with intangibles: Sources of growth and productivity trends, methods and main measurement challenges (Luiss Lab of European Economics technical report). Luiss Lab of European Economics. https://euklems-intanprod-llee....
 
8.
Corrado, C., Haskel, J., Iommi, M., Jona-Lasinio, C., Mas, M., & O’Mahony, M. (2017). Advancements in measuring intangibles for European economies. EURONA – Eurostat Review on National Accounts and Macroeconomic Indicators, 2, 7–34. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/....
 
9.
Ďurčová, J., & Pekarčík, M. (2023). Role of intangible assets in global value chains: Evidence from the Slovak Republic. Strategic Management, 28(4), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMa....
 
10.
Egger, H., Kreickemeier, U., Moser, C., & Wrona, J. (2024). Offshoring and job polarisation between firms. Journal of International Economics, 148, 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jint....
 
11.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2025, June 11). Tackling the EU’s shrinking workforce? Better education, more women in jobs, skilled migration. https://joint-research-centre. ec.europa.eu/jrc-news-and-updates/tackling-eus-shrinking-workforce-better-education-morewomen-jobs-skilled-migration-2025-06-11_en.
 
12.
Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. (1999). The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 907–941. https://doi.org/ 10.1162/003355399556179.
 
13.
Foster-McGregor, N., Stehrer, R., & De Vries, G. J. (2013). Offshoring and the skill structure of labour demand. Review of World Economics, 149, 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290....
 
14.
Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a....
 
15.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/411666....
 
16.
Gravina, A. F., & Foster-McGregor, N. (2024). Unraveling wage inequality: Tangible and intangible assets, globalization, and labor market regulations. Empirical Economics, 67(4), 1375–1420. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00181-024-02587-y.
 
17.
Harrison, A. E. (2025, May 20–23). Evidence from millions of firm records: Disentangling the role of technological change, intangible assets, market power, and globalization in driving changes in the labor share [Paper presentation]. Annual Conference on Trade and Globalization, Asian Bureau of Finance and Economic Research (ABFER), Singapore. https://abfer.org/media/abfere... entanglingVarious-Explanationsfor-the-Declining-Labor-Share_Evidence-from-Millions-of-Firm-Records. pdf
 
18.
Hertveldt, B., & Michel, B. (2013). Offshoring and the skill structure of labour demand in Belgium.De Economist, 164, 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645....
 
19.
Hijzen, A., Görg, H., & Hine, R. C. (2005). International outsourcing and the skill structure of labour demand in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 115(506), 860–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468....
 
20.
Landesmann, M., & Leitner, S. M. (2023). Immigration and offshoring: Two forces of globalisation and their impact on employment and the bargaining power of occupational groups. Review of. World Economics, 159, 361–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290...
 
21.
Lovaglio, P. G., & Riussi, M. (2025). How is labour demand changing across European regions in the post-COVID-19 era? International Regional Science Review, 48(5–6), 524–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 01600176251327985.
 
22.
Lukic, R., & Vojteski Kljenak, D. (2017). Analysis of intangible assets in retail trade. Strategic Management, 22(2), 18–26.
 
23.
Malewska, K. M., et al. (2025). Business process effectiveness: The role of knowledge transfer and integration. Management, 29(1), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/2....
 
24.
Mion, G., & Zhu, L. (2013). Import competition from and offshoring to China: A curse or blessing for firms? Journal of International Economics, 89, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jint....
 
25.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
 
26.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
 
27.
Rađenović, T., Krstić, B., Janjić, I., & Jovanović Vujatović, M. (2023). The effects of R&D performance on the profitability of highly innovative companies. Strategic Management, 28(3), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.5937/ StraMan2200034R.
 
28.
Remlein, M., Nowak, D., & Romanchuk, K. (2025). Automation of office work: Key challenges and limitations. Management, 29(1), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/2....
 
29.
Rogaczewski, R. (2025). The role and level of internationalization of transnational corporations in globalization processes. Management, 29(1), 927-939. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/2....
 
30.
Roth, F., & Mitra, A. (2025). EU competitiveness: The critical role of intangible assets in EU labour productivity growth (European Commission, Directorate‑General for Research and Innovation, Working Paper No. 2025/02). European Commission. https://research-and-innovatio.... eu/knowledge-publications-tools-and-data/publications/all-publications/eu-competitivenesscritical-role-intangible-assets-eu-labour-productivity-growth_enresearch-and-innovation.
 
31.
Stehrer, R. (2025). Labour demand and supply scenarios in the EU up to 2028: Are recent trends sustainable? (ETUI Working Paper 2025.01). European Trade Union Institute. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5227....
 
32.
Webb, M. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market (Unpublished manuscript). Stanford University. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p....
 
33.
Wright, G. C. (2014). Revisiting the employment impact of offshoring. European Economic Review, 66, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euro....
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top