SCIENCE ARTICLE
Foreign direct investment of Polish enterprises: the relationship between firm characteristics and the number of foreign units
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Economics and Technical Sciences, University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2026-02-03
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-03-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-04-25
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-06-03
 
 
Publication date: 2026-05-28
 
 
Corresponding author
Robert Rogaczewski   

Faculty of Economics and Technical Sciences, University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Przyjaźni 1, 62-510, Konin, Poland
 
 
Management 2026;(1):540-560
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
F21; F23; L25
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose:
The aim of this paper is to examine foreign direct investment (FDI) undertaken by Polish enterprises within the framework of the internationalization process, with particular emphasis on the number of foreign entities as a proxy for the degree of internationalization. The study seeks to identify the relationship between the number of foreign entities and selected firm characteristics, including expenditure on fixed assets, net sales revenue, the value of imports and exports, and the structure of employment.

Design/methodology/approach:
The research adopts a quantitative and analytical approach to assess the relationships between the number of foreign entities and selected characteristics of Polish enterprises engaged in internationalization. Pearson’s correlation coefficient is employed to examine the strength and direction of linear relationships between the analyzed quantitative variables.

Findings:
The results indicate that the development of key economic indicators—such as expenditure on fixed assets, sales revenue, employment, and trade turnover (imports and exports)—is closely associated with the growth in the number of foreign entities and the investment conditions prevailing in host countries. Polish enterprises increasingly allocate capital to Central and Eastern Europe as well as Western Europe, primarily due to cultural proximity and relatively short geographical distances, which facilitate efficient supply chain management. The findings confirm the growing importance of foreign direct investment in the internationalization process of Polish enterprises.

Value added and limitations:
This article contributes to the literature on business internationalization by integrating theoretical considerations with an empirical analysis of the relationship between the number of foreign entities of Polish firms and their selected economic characteristics. A limitation of the study is its focus on linear relationships and selected quantitative indicators, which may not fully capture the complexity of internationalization processes.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Akhtar, S. I., & Cimino-Isaacs, C.D. (2025). Foreign Direct Investment: Background and Issues. (CRS In Focus No. IF10636). Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-p....
 
2.
Amberger, H. J., & Kohlhase, S. (2023). International taxation and the organizational form of foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(8), 1529-1561. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267....
 
3.
Baldwin, R., & Freeman, R. (2022). Risks and global supply chains: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 153-180. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
 
4.
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21....
 
5.
Beugelsdijk, S., McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. (2010). Introduction: Place, space and organization – economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lb....
 
6.
Central Statistical Office, Information Department. (2015–2021). Activities of Enterprises with Foreign Entities. Statistics Poland. https://stat.gov.pl/ obszary-tematyczne/podmioty-gospodarczewyniki-finansowe.
 
7.
Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.....
 
8.
Dunning, J. H. (1991). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A personal perspective. In C. N. Pitelis & R. Sugden (Eds.), The Nature of the Transnational Firm (2nd ed., pp. 119-139). Routledge.
 
9.
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
 
10.
Emako, E., Nuru, S., & Menza, M. (2022). The effect of foreign direct investment on economic growth in developing countries. Transnational Corporations Review, 14(4), 382-401.https://doi.org/10.1080/191864....
 
11.
European Commission. (2021), Foreign Direct Investments (FDI). Single Market Scoreboard.
 
12.
Gereffi, G. (2018). Global value chains and development. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781108559423
 
13.
Head, K., & Ries, J. (2001). Overseas investment and firm exports. Review of International Economics, 9(1), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9....
 
14.
Helpman, E. (2011). Understanding global trade. Harvard University Press. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300-316. http://doi.org/10.1257/0002828....
 
15.
Kokko, A. (2003). The economics of foreign direct investment incentives (No. 3775). CEPR Discussion Papers.
 
16.
Marinov, M. A., & Marinova, S. T. (2000). Foreign direct investment in the emerging markets of Central and Eastern Europe: Motives and marketing strategies. In J. H. Dunning (Ed.),Globalization, the Multinational Firm, and Emerging Economies (pp. 21–52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-....
 
17.
Mihaylova, S. (2020). Foreign direct investment attractiveness of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European countries: The importance of policy-related location advantages. Croatian Economic Survey, 22(1), 65-101. https://doi.org/10.15179/ces.2....
 
18.
Narula, R., & Pineli, A. (2019). Improving the developmental impact of multinational enterprises: policy and research challenges. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812....
 
19.
Nocke, V., & Yeaple, S. (2007). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions vs. greenfield foreign direct investment: The role of firm heterogeneity. Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 336-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jinteco.2006.09.003.
 
20.
OECD. (2018). Global value chains and productivity. OECD Publishing.
 
21.
Penrose, E. (1994). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Business History Review, 68(3), 437.
 
22.
Rogaczewski, R. (2015). Ważniejsze metody pomiaru globalizacji i internacjonalizacji przedsiębiorstw [The main methods of measuring globalization and the internationalization of firms]. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Zarządzanie, 42(3), 59-71.
 
23.
Rogaczewski, R. (2025). The role and level of internationalization of transnational corporations in globalization processes. Management, 29(1), 925-939. https://10.58691/man/208188.
 
24.
Rugman, A.M. & Collinson, S. (2012). International Business. Harlow: Pearson.
 
25.
UNCTAD. (2023). World Investment Report 2023: Investing in Sustainable Energy for All. United Nations. https://unctad.org/wir.
 
26.
Verbeke, A. (2013). International business strategy. Cambridge University Press.
 
27.
Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290....
 
28.
Weisensee, M. (2012). Nachhaltigkeit ausländischer Direktinvestitionen in der Volksrepublik China [The sustainability of foreign direct investment in the People’s Republic of China ] (Vol. 13). Herbert Utz Verlag.
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top