SCIENCE ARTICLE
Assessment of investment attractiveness of foreign markets in selected Central and Eastern European countries using the multi-criteria Three-Field Plot method
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Economics and Technical Sciences, University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2026-01-13
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-05-01
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-05-16
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-07-02
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-24
 
 
Corresponding author
Robert Rogaczewski   

Faculty of Economics and Technical Sciences, University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Przyjaźni 1, 62-510, Konin, Poland
 
 
Management 2026;(1):692-707
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
F2
F21
F6
F5
O52
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose:
In contemporary conditions, driven by increasing business internationalization and the globalization of the world economy, managers at various organizational levels are required to conduct comprehensive analyses of the relationships among different groups of factors influencing the investment attractiveness of individual countries. The purpose of this article is to propose an analytical tool in the form of the multi-criteria Three-Field Plot method to support the selection of foreign markets as potential locations for foreign direct investment.

Design/methodology/approach:
The study applies the Three-Field Plot method to visualize and analyze complex interrelationships among multiple criteria affecting investment attractiveness. The empirical analysis focuses on selected Central and Eastern European countries.

Findings:
The application of the Three-Field Plot enables the identification of key determinants and their interdependencies that shape the investment attractiveness of foreign markets, providing a clearer and more structured basis for comparative assessment.

Value added and limitations:
The proposed approach adds value by offering an intuitive and integrated visual tool for strategic investment analysis that enhances managerial decision-making. A potential limitation is that the method depends on the selection and availability of relevant indicators, which may influence the results.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Aiginger, K., & Vogel, J. (2015). Competitiveness: from a misleading concept to a strategy supporting Beyond GDP goals. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 497-523. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-....
 
2.
Bevan, A. A., & Estrin, S. (2004). The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 775-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.....
 
3.
Buch, C. M., Kokta, R. M., & Piazolo, D. (2003). Foreign direct investment in Europe: Is there redirection from the South to the East?. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-....
 
4.
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2015). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. In P. J. Buckley & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), International business strategy: Theory and practice (pp. 574–600). Routledge.
 
5.
Campos, N. F., & Kinoshita, Y. (2008). Foreign direct investment and structural reforms: Evidence from Eastern Europe and Latin America (IMF Working Paper No. 2008/026). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/978145....
 
6.
Carneiro, J., Rocha, A. D., & Silva, J. F. D. (2008). Challenging the Uppsala internationalization model: a contingent approach to the internationalization of services. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 5, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-....
 
7.
Danciu, V. (2012). Models for the internationalization of the business: A diversity based approach. Management & Marketing, 7(1).
 
8.
Di Fatta, D., Musotto, R., & Vesperi, W. (2017). Government performance, ethics and corruption in the Global Competitiveness Index. In Governing business systems: theories and challenges for systems thinking in practice (pp. 141-151). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
9.
Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163-190.
 
10.
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
 
11.
Estrin, S., & Uvalic, M. (2014). FDI into transition economies: are the Balkans different?. Economics of Transition, 22(2), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.1....
 
12.
Falisová, D., & Glova, J. (2025). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Insights from selected EU countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Sustainability Issues, 12(3). http://doi.org/10.9770/w294593....
 
13.
Godlewska-Majkowska, H. (2012). Metodyka parametryzacji atrakcyjności inwestycyjnej regionów [A Methodology for the Parametric Assessment of Regional Investment Attractiveness]. SGH.
 
14.
Górska, M. (2013). Does the Uppsala internationalization model explain the internationalization process of professional business service firms? CBU International Conference Proceedings, 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.....
 
15.
Jantoń-Drozdowska, E., & Majewska, M. (2016). Investment attractiveness of Central and Eastern European countries in the light of new locational advantages development. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 11(1), 97-119. http://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.....
 
16.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.E. (2017). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. In International business (pp. 145–154). Routledge.
 
17.
Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
 
18.
Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World development, 29(9), 1501-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-....
 
19.
Miśkiewicz, D. (2018). Ekonomiczne determinanty atrakcyjności inwestycyjnej w tle ograniczeń budżetowych [Economic Determinants of Investment Attractiveness in the Context of Budget Constraints]. Współczesne Problemy Ekonomiczne. Globalizacja. Liberalizacja. Etyka, (16), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.18276/wpe.2....
 
20.
Ngo, M. T., & Pham, T. V. A. (2025). Unpacking the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Systematic Literature Review (2008–2024) and Future Research Agenda. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 13(4), 56-79.
 
21.
Nowicki, M. (Ed.) (2013). Atrakcyjność inwestycyjna województw i podregionów Polski 2013 [Investment Attractiveness of Polish Voivodeships and Subregions 2013]. Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką.
 
22.
Porter, M. E., Delgado, M., Ketels, C., & Stern, S. (2008). Moving to a new global competitiveness index. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2009, 43-63.
 
23.
Rogaczewski, R. (2025). The process of Internationalization and Methods of Measuring it in Business Activities Process. Humanitas Zarządzanie, 1. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.300....
 
24.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2025). World Investment Report 2025: International investment in the digital economy. UNCTAD.
 
25.
Vahlne, J. E., & Johanson, J. (2017b). From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1087-1102.
 
26.
Wach, K. (2021). The evolution of the Uppsala model: Towards non-linearity of internationalization of firms. International Entrepreneurship Review, 7(2), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2....
 
27.
World Bank (2021). Global Investment Competitiveness Report 2020/2021. World Bank.
 
28.
Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issues. Economic research--Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 857-887. http://doi.org/10.1080/1331677....
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top