SCIENCE ARTICLE
Systematic literature review of start-up. What is the scope and key paths of development?
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Organisation and Management Theory, Poznan University of Business and Economics, Poland
3
Department of Organisation and Management Theory, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2026-01-07
Final revision date: 2026-02-16
Acceptance date: 2026-03-28
Online publication date: 2026-04-27
Publication date: 2026-04-20
Corresponding author
Paweł Mielcarek
Department of Organisation and Management Theory, Poznan University of Business and Economics, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875, Poznań, Poland
Management 2026;(1):302-326
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose:
The lack of a uniform definition of a start-up, together with the diversity of research scopes and methodologies adopted, creates an unclear image of the phenomenon, limiting the ability to identify the factors, regularities and processes that determine start-ups. The goal of this paper is to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) to analyse, evaluate, and systematise knowledge about research on start-ups and the definitions used therein. The review will not only classify existing findings, but also identify areas for future research that could improve our understanding of how start-ups can thrive and achieve success.
Design/methodology/approach:
This study includes a four-stage procedure covering a systematic literature review of start-up publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) from 2000 to 2025. The main analysis phase involves examining the co-occurrence and total link strength of keywords in 12 620 start-up publications in the fields of business, management, and accounting. Several cluster maps were created using the VOSviewer software. The next step will focus on evaluating the definition of a start-up and analysing the key findings from the most-cited publications.
Findings:
Our study identified six clusters grouping 126 keywords with at least five time of occurrence. We also identified emerging trends from the analysed literature Based on a review of various proposals, we have also identified common features of the start-up definition with use of ‘Mentefacto Conceptual’ model including superordination, exclusions, and infraordinations. This has resulted in the proposal of an original start-up definition.
Value added and limitations:
This article makes an important theoretical contribution by offering a foundation for the reliable assessment of start-up research. It provides entrepreneurs, investors and decision-makers with guidance on understanding the phenomenon, its characteristics and the key findings about the development and survival of start-ups.
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Ajah, E. O. (2023). Investigating the factors fostering early-stage digital start-up survival during gestation in Nigeria market. Digital Business, 3(2), 100069.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digb....
2.
Azeem, M, & Khanna, A. (2024). A systematic literature review of startup survival and future research agenda. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 26(1), 111–139.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ JRME-03-2022-0040.
3.
Bergmann, H., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? – On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics, An Entrepreneurship Journal, 47, 53–76.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187....
4.
Berre, M., & Le Pendeven, B. (2023). What do we know about startup-valuation drivers? A systematic literature review. Venture Capital, 25(4), 385–429.
https://doi.org/10.1080/136910....
5.
Bethlendi, A., Hegedűs, S., & Szőcs, Á. (2025). What could we learn from startup failures? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 35.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731....
6.
BMJ, (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Research Methods & Reporting; 372, n71.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n7....
7.
Cassar, L. (2014). Industry and startup experience on entrepreneur forecast performance in new firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 137-151.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
8.
Colombo, M.G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders’ human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610-626.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
9.
Da Silva, L. S. C. V., Kaczam, F., de Barros Dantas, A., & Janguia, J. M. (2021). Startups: a systematic review of literature and future research directions. Revista de Ciências Da Administração, 23(60), 118-133.
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8....
10.
De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2010). Interrelationships between human capital, HRM and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(11), 1863-1883.
https://doi.org/10.1080/095851....
11.
Ghezzi, A., & Cavallo, A. (2020). Agile Business Model Innovation in Digital Entrepreneurship: Lean Startup Approaches. Journal of Business Research, 110, 519-537.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
12.
Gimenez-Fernandeza, E.M., Sandullia, F.D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49(10), 104049.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp....
13.
Gruber, M., MacMillan, I.C., & Thompson, J.D. (2013). Escaping the Prior Knowledge Corridor: What Shapes the Number and Variety of Market Opportunities Identified Before Market Entry of Technology Start-ups? Organization Science, 24(1), 280-300.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1....
14.
Guckenbiehl, P., Corral de Zubielqui, G., & Lindsay, N. (2021). Knowledge and innovation in startup ventures: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121026.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
15.
Hatzijordanou, N., Bohn, N., & Terzidis, O. (2019). A systematic literature review on competitor analysis: Status quo and start-up specifics. Management Review Quarterly, 69(4), 415–458.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301....
16.
Hein-Pensel, F., Winklerb, H., Brücknerc, A., Wölkea, M., Jabsb, I., Mayana, I.J, Kirschenbauma, A., Friedricha, J., & Zinke-Wehlmann, C. (2023). Maturity assessment for Industry 5.0: A review of existing maturity models. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 66, 200-210.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy....
17.
Henry, M., Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2020). A typology of circular start-ups: An Analysis of 128 circular business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118528.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
18.
Hormiga, E., Batista-Canino, R., & Sánchez-Medina, A. (2010). The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures. International Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 7, 71-92.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365....
19.
Horne, J., & Fichter, K. (2022). Growing for sustainability: Enablers for the growth of impact startups – A conceptual framework, taxonomy, and systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 349, 131163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
20.
Hornuf, L., Klus, M.F., Lohwasser, T.S., & A. Schwienbacher. (2021). How do banks interact with fintech startups? Small Business Economics, An Entrepreneurship Journal, 57, 1505–1526,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187....
21.
Kaiser, M., & Berger, E.S.C. (2021). Trust in the investor relationship marketing of startups: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 491–517.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301....
22.
Keogh, D., & Johnson, D. K. N. (2021). Survival of the funded: Econometric analysis of startup longevity and success. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(4), 29–49.
https://doi.org/10.7341/202117....
23.
Koe Hwee Nga J., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The Influence of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Social Entrepreneurship Start Up Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259–282.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551....
24.
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1023-1042.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365....
25.
Krejcí, M., Strielkowski, W., & Čabelková, I. (2015). Factors that influence the success of small and medium enterprises in ICT: A case study from the Czech Republic. Verslas: Teorija Ir Praktika, 16(3), 304–315.
https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.20....
26.
Kuester, S., Konya-Baumbach, E., & Schuhmacher, M.C. (2018). Get the show on the road: Go-to-market strategies for e-innovations of startups. Journal of Business Research, 83, 65-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
28.
Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., & Abrahamsson, P. (2014). Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 56(10), 1200-1218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infs....
29.
Paul, J., Lim, W., O’Cass, A., Hao, A., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(5), 1147-1147.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.1....
30.
Rizvanović, B., Zutshi, A., Grilo, A., & Nodehi, T. (2023). Linking the potentials of extended digital marketing impact and start-up growth: Developing a macro-dynamic framework of start-up growth drivers supported by digital marketing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
31.
Safari, A., Balicevac Al Ismail, V., Parast, M., Gölgeci, I., & Pokharel, S. (2023). Supply chain risk and resilience in startups, SMEs, and large enterprises: A systematic review and directions for research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 35(2), 680–709.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-1....
32.
Santisteban, J., & Mauricio, D. (2017). Systematic literature review of critical success factors of Information Technology startups. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23, 1–23.
33.
Spiegel, O., Abbassi, P., Zylka, P., Schlagwein, D., Fischbach, K. & Schoder, D. (2015). Business model development, founders’ social capital and the success of early stage internet start-ups: A mixed-method study. Information Systems Journal, 26(5), 421-449.
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12....
34.
Sulayman, M., Mendes, E., Urquhart, C., Riaz, M. & Tempero, E. (2014). Towards a theoretical framework of SPI success factors for small and medium web companies. Information and Software Technology, 56(7), 807-820.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infs....
35.
Torres-Carrión, P.V., González-González, C.S., Aciar, S., & Rodríguez-Morales, G. (2018). Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1364–1373.
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON....
36.
Trautwein, C. (2021). Sustainability impact assessment of start-ups – Key insights on relevant assessment challenges and approaches based on an inclusive, systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
37.
Yoon-Jun, L. (2010). Technology strategy by growth stage of technology-based venture companies. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(6), 216-234.