Vietnam’s Meat Import Market Under Impacts Of The European -Vietnam Free Trade Agreement And Quality Management Demand
 
More details
Hide details
1
M.Sc., Thuongmai University, Hanoi, Vietnam
 
2
Ph.D., Thuongmai University, Hanoi, Vietnam
 
3
MBA, Banking University HCMC, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, International University of Japan, Japan
 
 
Online publication date: 2021-08-10
 
 
Management 2021;25(1):99-117
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
M21
N1
 
ABSTRACT
The impact of Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on commercial business of the member could be assessed by the potential and tangible effects. This paper is adopted by Partial equilibrium theory and SMART tool to measure the impact of EVFTA on the Vietnamese meat import (HS code 02). The result of this model is claimed that EVFTA has a huge impact on boosting the meat import from EU to Vietnam. However, the value of import in this category from European nations in each country and good fluctuated significantly. This study also proposes some measures for domestic businesses and the government to ensure the benefits on Vietnam’s livestock industry. Last but not least, meat quality management is one of vital issues under EFVTA and global competitiveness to meet higher expectation of consumers. Good food (meat) manufacturing practices need to be applied. That is the social contribution value of this paper.
 
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: A temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892.
 
2.
Anh, T. T., & Ngoc, L. M. (2011). An assessment of the potential economic impacts of RCEP on Vietnam automobile sector1. The. World, 2013.
 
3.
Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?. Journal of international Economics, 71(1), 72-95.
 
4.
Board, S (2009). Partial equilibrium: Positive analysis, UCLA Economics. Availbale at: http://www.econ.ucla.edu/sboar....
 
5.
Brada, J. C., & Mendez, J. A. (1985). Economic integration among developed, developing and centrally planned economies: A comparative analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 549-556.
 
6.
Dat, P.M., Mau, N.D., Loan, B.T.T., Huy, D.T.N. (2020). Comparative China Corporate Governance standards After Financial Crisis, Corporate Scandals and Manipulation, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3).
 
7.
Hac, L.D., Huy, D.T.N., Thach, N.N., Chuyen, B.M., Nhung, P.T.H., Thang, T.D., Anh, T.T. (2021). Enhancing risk management culture for sustainable growth of Asia commercial bank -ACB in Vietnam under mixed effects of macro factors, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(3).
 
8.
Hang, T.T.B., Nhung, D.T.H., Hung, N.M., Huy, D.T.N., Dat, P.M. (2020). Where Beta is going–case of Viet Nam hotel, airlines and tourism company groups after the low inflation period, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3).
 
9.
Huy, D.T.N. (2015). The Critical Analysis of Limited South Asian Corporate Governance Standards After Financial Crisis, International Journal for Quality Research, 9(4): 741-764.
 
10.
Huy, D.T.N. (2012). Estimating Beta of Viet Nam listed construction companies groups during the crisis, Journal of Integration and Development, 15 (1), 57-71.
 
11.
Hertel, T., Hummels, D., Ivanic, M., & Keeney, R. (2007). How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?. Economic Modelling, 24(4), 611-635.
 
12.
Itakura, K., & Lee, H. (2019). Estimating the Effects of the CPTPP and RCEP in a General Equilibrium Framework with Global Value Chains.
 
13.
Kapuscinski, C. A., & Warr, P. G. (1999). Estimation of Armington elasticities: an application to the Philippines. Economic Modelling, 16(2), 257-278.
 
14.
Kumar, S., & Ahmed, S. (2014). Impact of sensitive lists under SAFTA: Quantitative assessment using a partial equilibrium modeling. European Journal of Globalization and Development Research, 10(1).
 
15.
Khan, M. A., Zada, N., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2018). Economic implications of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) on Pakistan: a CGE approach. Journal of Economic Structures, 7(1), 2.
 
16.
Lee, H., & Itakura, K. (2014). TPP, RCEP, and Japan’s agricultural policy reforms. OSIPP DiscussionPaper, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka.
 
17.
Li, Q. (2014, August). Analyzing Effects of RCEP on Foreign Direct Investment in a Firm Heterogeneity CGE Framework. In CGE Workshop, Melbourne, Australia.
 
18.
Li, Q., Scollay, R., & Gilbert, J. (2017). Analyzing the effects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on FDI in a CGE framework with firm heterogeneity. Economic Modelling, 67, 409-420.
 
19.
Llano, C., Pérez, J., Steinberg, F., & Hewings, G. J. (2019). Global and regional effects of the US tariffs on iron, steel and aluminium: A SMART combination of models with a focus on Spain. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(3), 525-547.
 
20.
Lu, S. (2018). Evaluation of the Potential Impact of CPTPP and EVFTA on Vietnam’s Apparel Exports: Are We Over-optimistic about Vietnam’s Export Potential?.
 
21.
Othieno, L., & Shinyekwa, I. (2011). Trade, revenue and welfare effects of the East African Community Customs Union Principle of Asymmetry on Uganda: an application of Wits-Smart simulation model (No. 677-2016-46674).
 
22.
Tinbergen, Jan J. (1962) “Shaping the world economy; suggestions for an international economic policy.”.
 
23.
Tu, T. A., Ngoc, L. M., & Hương, N. Q. (2017). An Assessment of the Potential Economic Impacts of RCEP on Vietnam Automobile Sector. SECO/WTI Academic Cooperation Project Working Paper Series, 5.
 
24.
WTO Center and Integration 2019, Summary of Vietnam’s FTAs as of July 2019, Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry - VCCI, Accessed at http://www.trungtamwto.vn/thon....
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top