SCIENCE ARTICLE
Aspects of money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CFT) risks in crowdfunding on the example of Poland
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Management and Computer Modelling, Kielce University of Technology, Poland
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-10-27
Final revision date: 2025-12-11
Acceptance date: 2025-12-22
Online publication date: 2026-02-09
Publication date: 2026-02-05
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Łusiakowski
Faculty of Management and Computer Modelling, Kielce University of Technology, Poland
Management 2025;(2):585-610
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose:
Digital technologies offer tangible economic benefits but are also exposed to the risk of misuse. Crowdfunding is a special support form for business, cultural or social enterprises. Due to anonymity, fragmentation of capital and wide coverage, crowdfunding transactions are particularly vulnerable to the risk of criminal activities related to the concealment of the source of income or illegal changes of the financing objective. This article addresses the risks of money laundering and terrorism financing, particularly on the specifics of crowdfunding. Research has proposed a synthetic risk indicator for AML/CFT, which may measure the level of risk and vulnerability of crowdfunding to money laundering and terrorism financing.
Design/methodology/approach:
The discussion in the article is presented against the background of a comprehensive and integrated review of literature, covering national and foreign sources. The theoretical part of the article utilizes: method of analysis and criticism of literature, analysis and synthesis, and method of analysis and logical construction. In the empirical part, to assess the level of risk and vulnerability of crowdfunding to AML/CFT risk compared to other areas, a research procedure based on the TOPSIS linear ordering method was used. The analysis covers the years 2019 and 2023.
Findings:
The results of the studies show that crowdfunding is one of the most vulnerable areas at risk of money laundering and terrorism financing. The high position in the ranking in 2019 and 2023 resulted mainly from the dynamic development of the crowdfunding market in Poland, its increasing availability, a high degree of decentralization, the occurrence of cross-border transactions and the increasing diversity of platforms in their business model. Maintaining the benefits of crowdfunding requires the simultaneous implementation of effective remedies, increased campaign transparency and close cooperation with supervisory authorities and institutions combating financial crime.
Value added and limitations:
The study makes an important contribution to the literature on the subject, providing information on the criminality of crowdfunding. The results of the study can be used by supervisory and regulatory authorities as a tool for shaping security in innovative segments of the financial system. The main limitation was the relatively small number of variables selected for the synthetic measure.
REFERENCES (56)
1.
Alińska, A. (2019). Alternatywne finanse [Alternative finance]. CeDeWu.PL.
3.
Barbu, C.M., Florea, D.L., Dabija, D.-C. & Barbu, M.C.R. (2021). Customer Experience in Fintech. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1415–1433.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer1....
4.
Będowska-Sójka, B., Kliber, A. & Laidroo, L. (2023). Has the pandemic changed the relationships between fintechs and banks?. Operations Research and Decisions, 33(4), 15–33.
https://doi.org/10.37190/ord23....
5.
Borkowski, M. (2019). Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne Szwecji na tle państw OECD [Swedish economic security on the background of OECD countries]. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 379, 7–30.
6.
Brunello, A. (2015/2016). Crowdfunding podręcznik Jak realizować swe pomysły za pomocą nowych narzędzi finansowania online [Crowdfunding handbook How to realise your ideas using new online financing tools]. CeDeWu.PL.
14.
Chodnicka, P. (2015). Pranie pieniędzy. Regulacje i ryzyko sektora bankowego [Money laundering. Regulations and risks in the banking sector]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
15.
Deng, L., Ye, Q., Xu, D., Sun, W., & Jiang, G. (2022). A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success. Financial Innovation, 8(41), 1–70.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854....
17.
Dziuba, D.T. (2015). Ekonomika crowdfundingu Zarys problematyki badawczej [The economics of crowdfunding An outline of the research issues]. Difin.
18.
European Banking Authority. (2022). Wytyczne w sprawie strategii i procedur zarządzania zgodnością z przepisami oraz roli i obowiązków pracownika ds. zgodności z przepisami AML/CFT wydane na podstawie art. 8 i rozdziału VI dyrektywy (UE) 2015/849 [Guidelines on compliance management strategies and procedures and the role and responsibilities of the AML/CFT compliance officer pursuant to Article 8 and Chapter VI of Directive (EU) 2015/849] EBA/GL/2022/05).
https://www.eba.europa.eu/site....
19.
Ertman, A. (2011). Zróżnicowanie elastyczności rynków pracy w wybranych krajach europejskich oraz USA w świetle metody TOPSIS [ Differences in labour market flexibility in selected European countries and the USA in light of the TOPSIS method]. Oeconomia Copernic, 2(3), 43–64.
21.
Financial Services Authority. (2022). AML/CFT risk-based supervision framework.
https://fsasvg.
com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/AML-CFT-RBS-Framewok.pdf
23.
Folwarski, M. (2019). Sektor FinTech na europejskim rynku usług bankowych Wyzwania konkurencyjne i regulacyjne [The FinTech sector in the European banking services market Competitive and regulatory challenges]. Poltext.
24.
Geceviciene, K., Danileviciene, I. & Okuneviciute-Neverauskiene, L. (2024). Impact of FinTech sector development on money laundering prevention. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 18(1), 54–66.
https://doi.org/10.26552/ems.2....
25.
Generalny Inspektor Informacji Finansowej. (2022). Komunikat nr 36 w sprawie oceny ryzyka instytucji obowiązanej [Announcement No. 36 on the risk assessment of the obligated institution].
https://www.gov.pl/web/finanse....
26.
Gibowski, Ł. (2025). Assessment of the Conditions for Developing the Financial Technology (Fin-Tech) Sector in Selected Countries in 2021. e-mentor, 109(2), 59–67.
https://doi.org/10.15219/em109....
27.
Goleński, W. R. (2023). Proceder prania pieniędzy - zarys problematyki [Money laundering – an overview of the issue]. Kontrola Państwowa, 4, 100-117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.53122/ISS....
28.
Golonka, A. (2020). Przeciwdziałanie praniu pieniędzy w obliczu zmian wprowadzonych IV i V dyrektywą AML [Anti-money laundering in light of changes introduced by the Fourth and Fifth AML Directives], Business Law Jorunal, 4/2020(862), 16–23.
https://doi.org/10.33226/0137-....
30.
Hajduk, S. & Jelonek, D. (2021). A Decision-Making Approach Based on TOPSIS Method for Ranking Smart Cities in the Context of Urban Energy. Energies, 14, 2691, 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en1409....
32.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer.
33.
International Finance Corporation. (2019). Anti-money-laundering (AML) & countering financing of terrorism (CFT) risk management in emerging market banks.
https://www.ifc.org/content/da....
35.
Karim, R. & Karmaker, C.L. (2016). Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 7–13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/aji....
37.
Kukuła, K. (2000). Metoda unitaryzacji zerowanej [Zero unitarisation method]. PWN.
38.
Lahrour, K., & Horr, L. (2025). Exploring the impact of fintech on financial inclusion: Literature review. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 6(6), 101–117.
39.
Ministerstwo Finansów. (2019). Krajowa ocena ryzyka prania pieniędzy oraz finansowania terroryzmu 2019 r. [National assessment of the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing 2019].
https://www.gov.pl/web/finanse....
40.
Ministerstwo Finansów. (2023). Krajowa ocena ryzyka prania pieniędzy oraz finansowania terroryzmu 2023 r. [National assessment of the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing 2023].
https://www.gov.pl/web/finanse....
41.
Najwyższa Izba Kontroli (NIK). (2025). Funkcjonowanie systemu przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy oraz finansowaniu terroryzmu [Functioning of the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing system].
https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id....
42.
Opitek, P. (2020). Pranie pieniędzy i finansowanie terroryzmu z wykorzystaniem walut [Money laundering and terrorist financing using virtual currencies]. Instytut Kościuszki.
https://ik.org.pl/wp-content/u... iem-walut-wirtualnych.pdf.
43.
Urząd Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego (UKNF). (2020). Stanowisko UKNF dotyczące oceny ryzyka instytucji obowiązanej [Position of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority on the risk assessment of obligated institutions].
https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/....
44.
United Nations. (2023). International human rights law considerations for counter-terrorism financing regulation of crowdfunding, virtual assets, and new payment technologies.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/de...
45.
Ustawa z dnia 1 marca 2018 r. o przeciwdziałaniu praniu pieniędzy oraz finansowaniu terroryzmu [Act of March 1, 2018 on counteracting money laundering and terrorist financing], Dz. U. 2025 poz. 644 (Poland).
46.
Ustawa o finansowaniu społecznościowym dla przedsięwzięć gospodarczych i pomocy z dnia 7 lipca 2022 r. [Act on crowdfunding for business ventures and assistance to borrowers of July 7, 2022], Dz. U. 2024 poz. 984, 1863 (Poland).
47.
Wójcik-Czerniawska A., & Pohulak-Żołędowska E., (2024). Finanse Ery Cyfrowej – nowe instrumenty finansowe w pozyskiwaniu kapitału przedsiębiorstw [Finance in the Digital Age – new financial instruments for raising capital for businesses]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
48.
Skrzyński, T. & Wasiuta, A. (2025). Assessing Municipal Performance in Serbia: A TOPSIS-Based Analysis of Economic Vitality and Public Safety Dynamics. Sustainability, 17, 5838, 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1713....
49.
Strahl, D. (2006). Metody oceny rozwoju regionalnego [Methods for assessing regional development]. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. O. Langego we Wrocławiu.
50.
Szopa, A. (2018). Crowdfunding models and platforms – case of Poland. In A. Pluszyńska & A. Szopa (Ed.), Crowdfunding w Polsce [Crowdfunding in Poland] (pp. 33-46). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
51.
Tian, J., Wei, J., Fan, W., & Wang, Y. (2024). When crowdfunding meets bank financing: Substitute or supplement?. International Journal of Production Economics, 277(C).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....
53.
Trzębinski, A. A. (2022). Crowdfunding donacyjny i sponsorski w Polsce [Donation-based and sponsorship-based crowdfunding in Poland].
https://zpf.pl/pliki/raporty/r....
54.
Zalewski, W. (2012). Zastosowanie metody TOPSIS do oceny kondycji finansowej spółek dystrybucyjnych energii elektrycznej [Application of the TOPSIS method to assess the financial condition of electricity distribution companies]. Ekonomia i Zarządzanie, 4(4), 137–145.
55.
Zeliaś, A. (Ed.). (2002). Taksonomiczna analiza przestrzennego zróżnicowania poziomu życia w Polsce w ujęciu dynamicznym [Taxonomic analysis of spatial differentiation of living standards in Poland in dynamic terms]. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie.