An attempt to determine the determinants of an effective impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. A pilot study report
 
More details
Hide details
1
Gdynia Maritime University, Faculty of Entrepreneurship and Quality Science, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2019-12-21
 
 
Management 2019;23(2):64-79
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
M14
M39
 
ABSTRACT
It is assumed that the idea of corporate social responsibility implemented by an enterprise will be appreciated by consumers. Consumers will be more willing to choose offers and support initiatives of socially responsible companies. Social responsibility, as a distinguishing mark used in positioning an enterprise (brand), also aims to contribute to building the loyalty of consumers who will be characterised, among others, by lower price sensitivity, and in their purchasing decisions they will be guided by the company’s positive image. The above assumptions are partly correct. According to numerous studies, consumers favour socially responsible companies. They declare positive attitudes towards such enterprises and their good practices. The problem is that consumer activity in supporting responsible companies is often limited to declarations. The fact that the costs of social responsibility, as manifested in a higher price, are mainly to be borne by consumers is not emphasised. It turns out that good practices accompanying the offer (brand) are not always an important selection criterion for the consumer. The purpose of the article is to attempt to define determinants of an effective impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. By an effective impact, the author understands that corporate social responsibility is an important criterion for the choice of an offer by the consumer. The article presents a review of selected studies on the impact of social responsibility on consumer behaviour. The empirical part describes a pilot study in which an attempt was made to identify the reasons for the lack of an effective impact of social responsibility on consumer behaviour. Respondents’ opinions on measures to increase the effectiveness of the impact of social responsibility on consumer behaviour were also obtained.
 
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An Exploratory Study into the Factors Impeding Ethical Consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), pp. 597-608, quoted after: Öberseder M., SchlegelmilchB.B., Gruber V. (2011), “Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 104.
 
2.
Bednarek, M. (2007). Doskonalenie systemów zarządzania: nowa droga do przedsiębiorstwa Lean, Difin, Warszawa, p. 24.
 
3.
Carrigan, M., Attalla, A., (2011). The myth of the ethical consumer -- do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), pp. 560-577, quoted after: M. Öberseder, B. B. Schlegelmilch, V. Gruber, “Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions, Journal of Business Ethics December 2011, Vol. 104, Is. 4, pp. 449-460.
 
4.
Currás-Pérez, E. Bigné-Alcañiz, A. Alvarado-Herrera (2009). The Role of Self-Definitional Principles in Consumer Identification with a Socially Responsible Company, Journal of Business Ethics, November 2009, Vol. 89, Is. 4, pp. 547-564.
 
5.
Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., Eckhardt, G., Birtchnell, T. (2006). The Other CSR: Consumer Social Responsibility (May 1, 2006). Stanford Social Innovation Review.
 
6.
Freeman, R.E., Velamuri, S.R (2008). A New Approach to CSR: Company Stakeholder Responsibility, p. 6.
 
7.
Lii, Y., Lee, M. (2012). Doing Right, Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 105, Is. 1, pp. 69-81.
 
8.
Marin, L., Ruiz, S., Rubio, A. (2009). The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 84, Is. 1, pp. 65-78.
 
9.
Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B.B., Gruber, V. (2011). “Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions, Journal of Business Ethics December 2011, Volume 104, Issue 4, pp. 449-460.
 
10.
Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2009). Strategia a społeczeństwo: społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu – pożyteczna moda czy nowy element strategii i konkurencyjnej?; [in:] Sekrety skuteczny chstrategii, spec. ed. Harvard Business Review Polska, p. 57.
 
11.
Sankar, Sen, Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, p. 225.
 
12.
Shuili, Du, Bhattacharya C.B., Sankar, Sen (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 12, Is. 1, pp. 8–19.
 
13.
Sojkin, B. (ed.)(2003). Zarządzanie produktem, PWE, Warszawa 2003, p. 211.
 
14.
Spodarczyk, E. (2016). The Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Micro and Small Enterprise Sector, [in:] F. Pinzaru, C. Bratianu (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance ECMLG 2016, ACPI, UK, pp. 248-254.
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top