Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About
Editorial Office
Scientific Board
Abstract & Indexing
Contact
Reviewers list
Editorial Policies
Authorship & COI
Ethical principles
Crossmark
Principles of Transparent Checklist
Open access
Reviewing procedure
Instruction for Authors
Guidelines for Authors
Manuscript Types
Manuscript structure
How to submit
The impact of firm size and its ownership on innovation cooperation in medium-high and high technology sectors in Poland
1
University of Zielona Góra Faculty of Economics and Management
Online publication date: 2014-06-27
Management 2014;18(1):385-396
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The main goal of this study is to identify the impact of firm size and its ownership on innovation cooperation in medium-high and high technology sectors in Poland between 2008-2013. The most open for innovation cooperation are large and foreign enterprises which mainly cooperate with foreign and national R&D units and universities.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Aydalot Ph., Keeble D. (eds.) (1988), High Technology and Innovative Environments. The European Experience, Routledge, London.
2.
Cooke Ph, Uranga M., Gomez E. (1997), Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organisational Dimension, “Research Policy”, No. 26.
3.
Crevoiser O., Maillat D. (1991), Industrial Organization and Territorial Production System - Towards a New Theory of Spatial Development, w: R. Camagni (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspective, Belhaven, London.
4.
Dachs B., Ebersberger B., Pyka A. (2008), Why do firms cooperate for innovation? A comparison of Austrian and Finnish CIS3 results, “International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy”, No. 4(3/4).
5.
Damanpour F. (1992), Organizational Size and Innovation.”Organization Studies”, No. 13 (3).
7.
Grudzewski W.M., Hajduk I. (1999), Przemiany w technice i technologii u progu XX wieku, (w:) M. Haffer, S. Sudoł, Przedsiębiorstwo wobec wyzwań przyszłości, Komitet Nauk Organizacji i Zarządzania, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
8.
GUS (2004), Nauka i technika w Polsce w 2003 roku, Informacje i Opracowania Statystyczne GUS, Warszawa.
9.
Hatzichronoglou T. (1996), Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification, OECD, Paris.
10.
Herrera L., Sánchez-Gonzalez G. (2013), Firm size and innovation policy, “International Small Business Journal”, Vol. 31, No. 2.
11.
Janasz W. (2005), Zmiany aktywności innowacyjnej Polski w okresie transformacji w: W. Janasz (red.), Innowacje w działalności przedsiębiorstw w integracji z Unią Europejską, Wyd. Difin, Warszawa.
12.
Janasz W. (2009), Innowacje w strategii rozwoju organizacji w Unii Europejskiej, Difin, Warszawa.
13.
Link A.N. (1980), Firm Size and Efficient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformulation of the Schumpeterian Hypothesis, “Journal of Political Economy”, Vol. 88, No. 4.
14.
Lipiec-Zajchowska M. (red.) (2003), Wspomaganie procesów decyzyjnych. Ekonometria, Wyd. C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
15.
Lundvall B.-A. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
17.
Norman R., Ramirez R. (1993), From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy, “Harvard Business Review”, July/August.
18.
Porter M. (1998), Clusters and the New Economics of Competition,” Harvard Business Review”, No. 11-12.
21.
Stone M.I., Schwarc N.L. (1975), Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey, “Journal of Economic Literature”, Vol.13, No.1.
22.
Świadek A. (2008), Determinanty aktywności innowacyjnej w regionalnych systemach przemysłowych w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin.
23.
Tether, B. (2002), Who co-operate for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis, “Research Policy”, no. 31 (6).
24.
Veugelers R., Cassiman B. (1999), Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing Firms, “Research Policy”, No. 28(1).
26.
Woodward R. (red.) (2005), Sieci innowacji w polskiej gospodarce-stan obecny i perspektywy rozwoju, nr 60, CASE, Warszawa.
CITATIONS (5):
1.
Perceived collaborative risk in small and medium technology enterprises
Karol Marek Klimczak, Wojciech Machowiak, Yochanan Shachmurove, Iwona Staniec
Journal of Small Business Management
Karol Marek Klimczak, Wojciech Machowiak, Yochanan Shachmurove, Iwona Staniec
Journal of Small Business Management
2.
Firm ownership and size versus innovation activities over the business cycle: near-zero inertia as a sign of the transition from the fifth to the sixth Kondratieff wave
Aleksander Jakimowicz, Daniel Rzeczkowski
Oeconomia Copernicana
Aleksander Jakimowicz, Daniel Rzeczkowski
Oeconomia Copernicana
3.
How large entrepreneurial-oriented companies breed innovation: the roles of interdepartmental collaboration and organizational culture
Xifang Ma, Zhengyun Rui, Genyuan Zhong
Chinese Management Studies
Xifang Ma, Zhengyun Rui, Genyuan Zhong
Chinese Management Studies
5.
Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability
Jean-François Henri, Marc Wouters
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Jean-François Henri, Marc Wouters
Accounting, Organizations and Society
| eISSN: | 2299-193X |
| ISSN: | 1429-9321 (1997-2019) |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
