Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About
Editorial Office
Scientific Board
Abstract & Indexing
Contact
Reviewers list
Editorial Policies
Authorship & COI
Ethical principles
Crossmark
Principles of Transparent Checklist
Open access
Instruction for Authors
Guidelines for Authors
Manuscript Types
Manuscript structure
How to submit
SCIENCE ARTICLE
The Moderating Role of Leader Member Exchange in the Effect of Role Clarity on Employee Accountability
1
Management, Kocaeli University, Turkey
2
Management, World Peace University, Turkey
3
Management, Milli Savunma Universitesi, Turkey
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-01-14
Final revision date: 2025-04-23
Acceptance date: 2025-05-06
Online publication date: 2025-06-02
Publication date: 2025-06-06
Management 2025;(1):467-491
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
M10
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose: Emphasizing the moderating influence of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), this study investigates the link between role clarity (RC) and employee responsibility (EA). RC is the employees’ awareness of their duties; EA is the acceptance of professional obligations—both of which are essential in improving organizational performance.
Design/methodology/approach: The s tudy specifically searches at whether high-quality LMX increases the RC–EA link within hierarchical systems including public institutions. Public sector workers in Northern Cyprus were surveyed using a convenience sampling approach. Ethical principles guided the distribution of 500 surveys; 328 valid replies were kept for analysis. RC, EA, and LMX were measured using established and validated scales. Correlations and moderating effects were investigated using AMOS, SPSS and Hayes’ Process Macro.
Findings: The results reveal a significant positive relationship between RC and EA (β = 0.303, p < 0.05). Additionally, LMX significantly moderates this relationship (β =0.098, p < 0.05), with the RC–EA link being stronger when LMX is high. Even under low-LMX conditions, a meaningful relationship persists. This study contributes to the understanding of how leadership dynamics influence employee behavior, highlighting the value of fostering strong leader-member relationships to improve accountability.
Value added and limitations: These results underline the need of developing interpersonal assets and encouraging good leader-member interaction to enhance organizational performance and employee involvement. The results of the study have relevance for managerial practices, especially the requirement for explicitly stated job descriptions, open communication policies, and flexible leadership methods suited to the caliber of LMX. In the end, these ideas could help strategic initiatives meant to promote a culture of responsibility and accountability, performance
appraisal systems, and organizational training courses. The dependence on selfreported data, and regional emphasis of the study, however, limit its generalizability. Future studies are invited to investigate the functions of digital communication tools in improving role clarity and LMX by using longitudinal techniques and including various organizational settings. Such additions could increase knowledge of these notions and their long-term consequences in dynamic work contexts
REFERENCES (43)
2.
Asamani, L., Acquah-Coleman, R., Senayah, W. K., & Oppong, S. (2025). Interactive roles of resource availability, role clarity and employee motivation in enhancing organisational effectiveness through employee performance and job satisfaction. Discover Psychology, 5(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202....
4.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: a Review and Future Directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaq....
5.
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.
6.
Eisenbeiss, S. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2014). On ethical leadership impact: The role of follower mindfulness and moral emotions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.19....
7.
Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00127....
8.
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9....
9.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/315131....
10.
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
11.
Gabel-Shemueli, R., & Riva Zaferson, F. A. (2021). Toward an understanding of the relationship between LMX and performance over time: the role of trust in leader and appraisal satisfaction. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 34(4), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-1....
12.
Gilboa, S., Shirom, A., Fried, Y., & Cooper, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: Examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 227–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744....
13.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9....
14.
Griffeth, R. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-....
15.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Black, B., & Babin, B. (2016). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed.
16.
Han, Y., & Perry, J. L. (2019). Employee accountability: development of a multidimensional scale. International Public Management Journal, 23(2), 224–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/109674....
17.
Han, Y., & Perry, J. L. (2020). Conceptual Bases of Employee Accountability: A Psychological Approach. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(4), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov....
18.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: a regression-based Approach (1st ed.). The Guilford Press.
19.
Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(1), 16–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5....
20.
Jo, H., & Shin, D. (2025). The impact of recognition, fairness, and leadership on employee outcomes: A large-scale multi-group analysis. PLOS ONE, 20(1), e0312951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
21.
Kiazad, K., Hom, P., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Holtom, B. (2024). High-performance work practices and job embeddedness: A comprehensive test. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 155, 104066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.....
22.
Kock, N. (2015). A Note on How to Conduct a Factor-Based PLS-SEM Analysis. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2....
23.
la Paz Fernández, M. de, Chan, Y.-B., Yew, J. Y., Billeter, J.-C., Dreisewerd, K., Levine, J. D., & Kravitz, E. A. (2010). Correction: Pheromonal and Behavioral Cues Trigger Male-to-Female Aggression in Drosophila. PLoS Biology, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/annota....
24.
Lan, M., Hu, Z., & Nie, T. (2025). Unwilling or Unable? The Impact of Role Clarity and Job Competence on Frontline Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors in Hospitality Industry. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 526–526. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs1504....
25.
Lapierre, L. M., & Hackett, R. D. (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317....
26.
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.40....
27.
Liu, E., & Wang, J. (2021). Examining the Relationship Between Grit and Foreign Language Performance: Enjoyment and Anxiety as Mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
28.
Nguyen, V. L., & Haar, J. (2024). When work–life balance fails to boost organizational citizenship behaviors: the moderating role of leader–member exchange. Evidence-Based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-....
29.
Örtqvist, D., & Wincent, J. (2006). Prominent consequences of role stress: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(4), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5....
30.
Pareek, U. (2002). Training instruments in HRD and OD. Tata: McGraw Hill Publishing Ltd.
31.
Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2....
32.
Perry, J. L., & Rainey, H. G. (1988). The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 182-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/258571.
33.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral research: a Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9....
34.
Sürücü, L., Şeşen, H., & Maslakçı, A. (2023). Regression, Mediation/Moderation, and Structural Equation Modeling with SPSS, AMOS, and PROCESS Macro. Livre de Lyon.
35.
Sürücü, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726. http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmi....
36.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
37.
Tan, F. Z., & Olaore, G. O. (2021). Effect of organizational learning and effectiveness on the operations, employees productivity and management performance. Vilakshan - XIMB Journal of Management, 19(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/xjm-09....
38.
Tasdemir, D. D., Lutfi, S., & Bekmezci, M. (2024). Common Goals, Extraordinary Outcomes: Follower-Leader Goal Congruence’s Influence on Inclusive Leadership and Extra-Role Behavior. Pacific Business Review International, 17(4), 15-29.
39.
Tasdemir, D. D., Yamen, M., & Demirkaya, H. (2017). A research about improvability of military leadership features which trained in the school of Turkish army. Eurasian Business and Economics Journal, 1(1), 146–157.
40.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
41.
Tubre, T. C., & Collins, J. M. (2000). Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance. Journal of Management, 26(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
42.
Wright, B. E., & Davis, B. S. (2003). Job Satisfaction In The Public Sector. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507....
43.
Yadav, M., & Rangnekar, S. (2013, December 13). Role Clarity in India: Examining the Psychometric Properties of Role Ambiguity: Role Clarity Questionnaire. Ssrn.com. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2430....
| eISSN: | 2299-193X |
| ISSN: | 1429-9321 (1997-2019) |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
