Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About
Editorial Office
Scientific Board
Abstract & Indexing
Contact
Reviewers list
Editorial Policies
Authorship & COI
Ethical principles
Crossmark
Principles of Transparent Checklist
Open access
Instruction for Authors
Guidelines for Authors
Manuscript Types
Manuscript structure
How to submit
Team dimension of relational competence of organisation – psychological perspective*
1
University of Silesia in Katowice
Online publication date: 2016-01-29
Management 2015;19(2):7-20
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This article is a part of theoretical model for the research project titled “Relational competence as a determinant of effectiveness and efficiency of inter-organizational relations”. The authors deliberate upon team-level determinants of relational competence of organizations involved in inter-organizational cooperation in the light of classic and modern psychological theories and concepts. The aim of this article is to present authors’ own approach used in research on relational competence of organizations and based on multilevel analysis of influence regulation in teams (individual-, team- and organizational levels) together with motivation and work engagement. We search for correlations between psychological variables and relational competence and relation’s results. We assume that on individual- as well as on team-level preexist some features determining relation’s success, such as: open and effective collaboration, readiness to take responsibility for management, leadership division, autonomous motivation and work engagement.
REFERENCES (63)
1.
Abrams D., Hogg M. A. (red.) (1990), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances, Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
2.
Abrams D., Hogg M. A. (red.) (1999), Social identity and social cognition, England: Blackwell, Oxford.
3.
Allred C.R., Fawcett S. E., Wallin, C. Magnan G. (2011), A Dynamic Collaboration Capability as a Source of Competitive Advantage, „Decision Sciences”, Vol. 42, No. 1.
4.
Ashforth B. E., Mael, F. (1989), Social identity theory and the organization, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 14, No. 1.
5.
Avolio B.J. (2007), Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building, „The American Psychologist”, Vol. 62.
6.
Avolio B., Jung D., Murry B., Sivasubramaniam N. (1996), Building highly developed teams: Focusing on the process and performance. w: M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, S. Beyerlein (red.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, Vol. 3., CT: JAI Press, Greenwich.
7.
Barry D. (1991), Managing the bossless team: lessons in distributed leadership, “Organizational Dynamics”, Vol. 21. No. 1.
8.
Bass B.M. (1990), Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications. Free Press, New York.
9.
Blomqvist K., Levy J. (2006), Collaboration capability – a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks, “International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy”, Vol. 2, No. 1.
10.
Campion M.A., Medsker G.J., Higgs A.C. (1993), Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work group,. “Personnel Psychology” Vol. 46. No. 4.
11.
Carson J.B., Tesluk P.E., Marrone J.A. (2007), Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance, “Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 50.
12.
Chan D. (1998), Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models, “Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 83, No 2.
13.
Chemers M.M. (2001). Leadership effectiveness: An integrative review, w: M.A. Hogg, R.S. Tindale (red.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Group processes, UK Blackwell, Oxford.
14.
Ciszewska-Mlinaric M., Mlinaric F., Obłój K. (2011), Zdolność relacyjna, kompetencje organizacyjne i wyniki finansowe małych i średnich firm słoweńskich, „Master of Business Administration”, No. 4.
15.
Dyer J.H., Singh H. (1998), The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 23.
16.
Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B., (red.) (1999), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content, Blackwell, Oxford.
17.
Grauman C.F., Moscovici S. (1986), Changing Concepts of Crowd Mind and Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York.
18.
Hamel G., Prahalad C.K. (1990), The Core Competence of the Corporation, w: D. Hahn, B. Taylor (red.) Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3.
19.
Herscovitch L., Meyer J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model, „The Journal of Applied Psychology”, No. 87.
20.
Hodgkinson G.P., Healey M.P. (2011), Psychological foundation of dynamic capabilities: reflection and reflection in strategic management, „Strategic Management Journal” Vo. 32.
21.
Hogg M., Terry D. (2001), Social Identity in Organizational Contexts, Taylor and Francis, Ann Arbor.
22.
Hogg M.A. (2001), A social identity theory of leadership, “Personality and Social Psychology Review”, Vol. 5. No. 3.
23.
Hogg M.A., Abrams D. (1988), Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes, Routledge, London.
24.
Hogg M. A., McGarty C. (1990), Self- Categorization and Social Identity, w: D. Abrams, M.A. Hogg (red.) Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, Harvest Wheatshea, London.
25.
Hogg M.A. (2004). Social Categorization, Depersonalization, and Group Behavior, w: M. B. Brewer, M. Hewstone (red.) Self and social identity, Blackwell Publishing, Malden.
27.
Katzenbach J.R. (1997). The myth of the top management team, “Harvard Business Review”, Vol. 7. No. 6.
28.
Katzenbach J.R., Smith D.K. (1993), The wisdom of teams. Creating the High Performance Organization, Harvard Business School Press.
29.
Kożusznik B. (1995), Work teams and organization: conscious regulation and getting rid of influence, “The Business Research Yearbook”, Vol. 2. University Press of America, Inc. Lanham, MD.
30.
Kożusznik B. (1996), Podmiotowość zespołu pracowniczego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.
31.
Kożusznik B. (2002), Free Space for Human Capital development. Deinfluentization as Conscious Withdrawal of influence and Its Psychological Correlates, “Polish Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 2.
34.
Kożusznik B. (2006), Deinfluentization and self-monitoring as influence regulation tactics of Polish women and men managers, “Women in Management Review”, Vol. 21, No. 2.
35.
Krzakiewicz K., Cyfert S. (2014), The Strategic Dimension of the Dynamic Capabilities of Enterprise, “Management”, Vol. 18, No. 2.
38.
Linville P.W., Johnes E.E. (1980), Polarized appraisal of outgroup members, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 38.
39.
Lorenzoni G., Lipparini A. (1999), The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study, “Strategic Management Journal” Vol. 20.
40.
Mael F., Ashforth B. E. (1992), Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 13.
41.
Manz C. C., Sims H. P. Jr. (1993), Business without bosses: How self-managing teams are building high performance companies, Wiley, New York.
42.
McCallum S., O’Connell D. (2009), Social Capital and Leadership Development: Building Stronger Leadership through Enhancing Relational Skills, „Leadership and Organization Development Journal”, Vol. 30, No.2.
43.
Meyer J. P., Allen N. J. (1991), A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, „Human Resource Management Review”, Vol. 1.
44.
Pearce C. L., Conger J. A., Locke E. (2003), Shared Leadership : Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
45.
Perry M. L., Pearce C. L., Sims H. P., Jr. (1999), Empowered selling teams: How shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes, „Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management”, Vol. 19.
46.
Ring P.S., Van de Ven A.H. (1994), Developmental process of cooperative interorganizational relationships. „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 19, No. 1.
47.
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000), Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, „The American Psychologist”, Vol. 55.
48.
Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A. B. (2010), Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept, w: A.B. Bakker, M. P. Leiter (red.), Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology Press Taylor and Francis Group, New York.
50.
Schruijer S.G.L., (2008), The social psychology of inter-organizational relations, w: S. Cropper (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
51.
Stalk G., Evans P., Shulman L.E. (1992), Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy, “Harvard Business Review”, Vol. 70, No. 2.
52.
Sulimowska-Formowicz M. (2013), Relational capabilities as effectiveness fundamentals of inter-firm cooperation, w: J. Foltys, L. Lesakova, M. Uramowa, A. Wziątek-Staśko (red.), Contemporary Challenges Towards Management III, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.
53.
Sulimowska-Formowicz M. (2015). Relational competence of a firm as a determinant of inter-organizational relations’ effectiveness and efficiency - a study from Polish market, proceedings of the 31 IMP Conference, Kolding.
54.
Tajfel, H. (red.) (1978), Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Academic Press, London.
55.
Tajfel H., Turner J.C. (1979), An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, w: W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (red.) The social psychology of intergroup relations, CA: Brooks-Cole, Monterey.
56.
Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 17, No 7.
57.
Turner J. C., Hogg M. A., Oakes P. J., Reicher S. D., Wetherell M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
58.
Van Knippenberg B., Steensma H. (2003), Future Interaction Expectation and the use of soft and hard influence tactics, „Applied Psychology: An International Review”, Vol. 52, No. 1.
59.
Walton G.M. (2014), The new science of wise psychological interventions, “Current Directions in Psychological Science”, Vol. 23, No. 1.
60.
Wang D., Waldman D. A., Zhang Z. (2013), A Meta-Analysis of Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 99, No. 2.
61.
Worchel S., Rothgerber, H., Day A., Hart D., Butemeyer J. (1998), Social identity and individual productivity within groups, „British Journal of Social Psychology”, Vol. 37.
62.
Yeatts D.E., Hyten C. (1998), High-Performing Self-Managed Work Teams: A Comparison of Theory and Practise, CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
| eISSN: | 2299-193X |
| ISSN: | 1429-9321 (1997-2019) |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
