Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Policies
Instruction for Authors
2/2025
Views:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Get citation
SCIENCE ARTICLE
Influence of Industry 4.0 technologies on strategic agility
Maja Sajdak 1
,
 
Młody Michał 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Strategic Management, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-02-18
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-04-02
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-08-07
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-10-10
 
 
Publication date: 2025-09-19
 
 
Corresponding author
Maja Sajdak   

Department of Strategic Management, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875, Poznań, Poland
 
 
Management 2025;(2):40-62
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58691/man/209129
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (83)
 
KEYWORDS
Industry 4.0
strategic agility
technologies 4.0
agility attributes
 
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
L1
L2
L6
M2
O31
O32
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose:
Amidst escalating market volatility, manufacturers are increasingly leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance strategic agility. However, a nuanced understanding of their influence on core agility dimensions—strategic sensitivity, entrepreneurial dynamism, operational flexibility, and strategic leadership—remains limited. The purpose of the study is to evaluate how Industry 4.0 technologies support various aspects of strategic agility in manufacturing companies.

Design/methodology/approach:
The study employs a qualitative methodology, involving in-depth interviews with 11 informants from three selected manufacturing industry sectors. Data analysis was conducted using research triangulation, thereby increasing the credibility.

Findings:
The results indicate that Industry 4.0 technologies significantly support the strategic agility of companies, particularly in the areas of strategic sensitivity and strategic entrepreneurship by enabling faster identification and response to market changes and improving collaboration and innovation. Operational flexibility is also strongly enhanced by automation and improved data analytics, allowing companies to adapt more quickly to changing market demands. The impact of technologies on strategic leadership is less noticeable, as it still largely depends on human factors.

Value added and limitations:
This study advances understanding of Industry 4.0's impact on strategic agility in manufacturing. The study expands existing theoretical frameworks by integrating concepts co-creating strategic agility, such as dynamic capabilities and the resource-based view, with the Industry 4.0 perspective. Additionally, it highlights the complementary role of human leadership in effectively deploying these technologies, offering a nuanced understanding of the interplay between technological innovation and strategic management. For practitioners, the study offers actionable insights into leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies to boost strategic agility. By understanding these dynamics, companies can optimize production processes, reduce errors, and sustain a competitive edge. Our study’s limitations include its focus on Polish manufacturing firms, potential biases from qualitative methods, and a narrow scope of technologies, highlighting the need for broader, quantitative research across industries and Industry 4.0 solutions like blockchain and quantum computing.
REFERENCES (83)
1.
AlNuaimi, B.K., Singh, S.K., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering Digital Transformation: The Nexus Between Leadership, Agility, and Digital Strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Alvesson, M., & Ashcraft, L.K. (2012). Interviews. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Ed.). Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges (pp. 245–263). Los Angeles: Sage.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Arthur, B.W. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. Free Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Ballestar, M. T., Díaz-Chao, Á., Sainz, J., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2020). Knowledge, robots and productivity in SMEs: Explaining the second digital wave. Journal of Business Research, 108, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy:Toward a next-generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/...
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021). Agility for successful digital transformation. In M. J. Sellitto & L. C. Matheus (Eds.), Digital transformation management for agile organizations: A compass to sail the digital world (pp. 167–187). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Chan, A. T. L., Ngai, E. W. T., & Moon, K. K. L. (2017). The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Côrte-Real, N., Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2019). Unlocking the drivers of big dataanalytics value in firms. Journal of Business Research, 97, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Crocitto, M. (2003). The human side of organizational agility. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(6), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/026355....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Crossan, M., Vera, D., & Nanjad, L. (2008). Transcendent leadership: Strategic leadership in dynamic environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaq...
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
de Oliveira-Dias, D., Maqueira-Marin, J. M., Moyano-Fuentes, J., & Carvalho, H. (2023). Implications of using Industry 4.0 base technologies for lean and agile supply chains and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 262, 108916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Doz, Y. (2020). Fostering strategic agility: How individual executives and human resource practices contribute. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2008). Fast strategy: How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of the game. Wharton School Publishing.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Eswaran, M., & Bahubalendruni, M. V. A. (2022). Challenges and opportunities on AR/VR technologies for manufacturing systems in the context of Industry 4.0: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Faruquee, M., Paulraj, A., & Irawan, C. A. (2021). Strategic supplier relationships and supply chain resilience: Is digital transformation that precludes trust beneficial? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(7), 1192–1219. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Gebhardt, M., Kopyto, M., Birkel, H., & Hartmann, E. (2022). Industry 4.0 technologies as enablers of collaboration in circular supply chains: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 60(24), 6967–6995. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075...
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Calic, G. (2020). Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data. Journal of Business Research, 108, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910–936.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Goldratt, E. M. (1984). The goal: A process of ongoing improvement. North River Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Götz, M. (2019). The Industry 4.0 induced agility and new skills in clusters. Foresight and STI Governance, 13(1), 72–83.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Gou, J., Li, N., Lyu, T., Lyu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Barriers of knowledge transfer and mitigating strategies in collaborative management system implementations. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(1), 2–20.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Graebner, M. E., Martin, J. A., & Roundy, P. T. (2012). Qualitative data: Cooking without a recipe. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/147612....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Henke, N., & Willmott, P. (2018). Digital trends and observations from Davos. McKinsey Digital.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Hofmann, E., Sternberg, H., Chen, H., Pflaum, A., & Prockl, G. (2019). Supply chain management and Industry 4.0: Conducting research in the digital age. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(10), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Holbeche, L. S. (2018). Organisational effectiveness and agility. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 5(3), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Huang, Y. Y., & Li, S. J. (2009). Tracking the evolution of research issues on agility. Asia Pacific Management Review, 14(2), 107–129.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2005). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.20...
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Ivory, S. B., & Brooks, S. B. (2018). Managing corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens: Lessons from strategic agility. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Jambulingam, T., Kathuria, R., & Doucette, W. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation as a basis for classification within a service industry: The case of retail pharmacy industry. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M., & Giallanza, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: A systematic review and future research directions. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5725. https://doi.org/10.3390/app111....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Jankowska, B., Mińska-Struzik, E., Bartosik-Purgat, M., Götz, M., & Olejnik, I. (2023). Industry 4.0 technologies adoption: Barriers and their impact on Polish companies’ innovation performance. European Planning Studies, 31(5), 1029–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/096543...
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. acatech—National Academy of Science and Engineering.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Kearney. (2020). The state of Industry 4.0. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.kearney.com/operat....
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Konopik, J., Jahn, C., Schuster, T., Hoßbach, N., & Pflaum, A. (2022). Mastering the digital transformation through organizational capabilities: A conceptual framework. Digital Business, 2, 100019.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digb....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Konur, S., Lan, Y., Thakker, D. (2021). Towards design and implementation of Industry 4.0 for food manufacturing. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Kraus, S., Kauranen, I., & Reschke, C. H. (2011). Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach. Management Research Review, 34(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/014091...
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Lin, K. Y., Shyu, J. Z., & Ding, K. (2018). A cross-strait comparison of innovation policy under Industry 4.0 and sustainability development transition. Sustainability, 10(4), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1004...
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Makarius, E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J., & Fox, A. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus...
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Maskell, B. (2001). Insight from industry: The age of agile manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/135985....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Mavengere, N. B. (2013). Strategic agility and the role of information systems in supply chain: Telecommunication industry study. In S. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation (ECIME 2013) (pp. 229–238). Academic Conferences International.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Mehta, P., Butkewitsch-Choze, S., & Seaman, C. (2018). Smart manufacturing analytics application for semi-continuous manufacturing process – A use case. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, 1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prom....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 272–298
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Młody, M. (2019). Lęk technologiczny jako patologia organizacyjna w dobie czwartej rewolucji przemysłowej. [Technophobia as Organizational Pathology in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, 175, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Młody, M., Ratajczak-Mrozek, M., & Sajdak, M. (2023). Industry 4.0 technologies and managers’ decision-making across the value chain: Evidence from the manufacturing industry. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-20...
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. ustainability, 10(1), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1001...
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 233–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301...
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.19....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Nguyen, T., Le, C. V., Nguyen, M. (2024). The organisational impact of agility: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Păvăloaia, V. D., & Necula, S. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a disruptive technology—A systematic literature review. Electronics, 12(5), 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/electr....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10(10), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1010...
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Ping, T. A., Chinn, C. V., Yin, Y. L., & Muthuveloo, R. (2018). The impact of information technology capability, business intelligence use, and collaboration capability on organizational performance among public listed companies in Malaysia. Global Business and Management Research, 10(2), 293–312
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Queiroz, M., Tallon, P. P., Sharma, R., & Coltman, T. (2018). The role of IT application orchestration capability in improving agility and performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
58.
Raji, A. M., Olodo, H. B., Oke, T. T., Addy, W. A., Ofodile, O. C., & Oyewole, A. T. (2021). Business strategies in virtual reality: A review of market opportunities and consumer experience. International Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 6(3), 722–736. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer...
Google Scholar
 
 
59.
Rajput, S., & Singh, S. P. (2019). Connecting circular economy and Industry 4.0. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
60.
Ratnasingam, J., et al. (2020). Assessing the awareness and readiness of the Malaysian furniture industry for Industry 4.0. BioResources, 15(3), 4866–4885.
Google Scholar
 
 
61.
Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity, and organizational agility. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
62.
Rawashdeh, A., Abdallah, A. B., Alfawaeer, M., Al Dweiri, M., & Al-Jaghbeer, F. (2024). The impact of strategic agility on environmental sustainability: The mediating role of digital transformation. Sustainability, 16(3), 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1603...
Google Scholar
 
 
63.
Sahoo, P., Saraf, P. K., & Uchil, R. (2024). Identification of critical success factors for leveraging. Industry 4.0 technology and research agenda: A systematic literature review using PRISMA protocol. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(3), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-...
Google Scholar
 
 
64.
Sajdak, M. (2015). Compilation of operational and strategic agility for ensuring the highest efficiency of company operations. Economics and Management, 7(2), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.12846/j.em.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
65.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
Google Scholar
 
 
66.
Sen, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 and organizational agility: A theoretical exploration. Journal of Business Research, 121, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
67.
Sestino, A., Prete, M. I., Piper, L., & Guido, G. (2020). Internet of Things and big data as enablers for business digitalization strategies. Technovation, 98, 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
68.
Shahzad, K., Helo, P., Ranta, M., & Nousiainen, E. (2024). Blockchain technology for operational excellence and supply chain resilience: A framework based on use cases and an architecture demonstration. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
69.
Sokołowski, A., & Markowska, M. (2021). Adjustment of companies to the requirements of the fourth industrial revolution – Regional approach. Wiadomości Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician, 66(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.300....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
70.
Sony, M., & Naik, S. (2020). Critical factors for the successful implementation of Industry 4.0: A review and future research direction. Production Planning & Control, 31(10), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/095372...
Google Scholar
 
 
71.
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/...
Google Scholar
 
 
72.
Tallon, P. P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., & Sharma, R. (2019). Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
73.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...- 0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Google Scholar
 
 
74.
Vázquez-Bustelo, D., Avella, L., & Fernández, E. (2007). Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(12), 1303–1332. https://doi.org/10.1108/014435....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
75.
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus...
Google Scholar
 
 
76.
Wamba, S. F. (2022). Impact of artificial intelligence assimilation on firm performance: The mediating effects of organizational agility and customer agility. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
77.
Wanasida, A. S., Bernarto, I., Sudibjo, N., & Purwanto, A. (2021). The role of business capabilities in supporting organization agility and performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 897–911.
Google Scholar
 
 
78.
Sajdak, M. (2019). Companies’ sensitivity to the environment from the perspective of competitive advantage – Research results. Management Issues, 17(4), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
79.
Sajdak, M., Młody, M., Weinert, A., & Wójtowicz, Ł. (2022). How Industry 4.0 supports the strategic agility of companies: A systematic literature review. Central European Review of Economics and Finance, 41(2), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.24136/ceref....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
80.
Yasin, E. T., Hamadamen, N. I., Loganathan, G. B., & Ganesan, M. (2021). Recent scope for AI in ihe food production industry leading to the fourth industrial revolution. Webology, 18(2), 1066–1080.
Google Scholar
 
 
81.
Yousuf, A., Haddad, H., Pakurar, M., Kozlovskyi, S., Mohylova, A., Shlapak, O., & Janos, F. (2019).The effect of operational flexibility on performance: A field study on small and medium-sized industrial companies in Jordan. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(2), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
82.
Zhang, Z., & Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4), 496–513.
Google Scholar
 
 
83.
Zhen, G., Li, J., Ren, Z., & Sun, M. (2023). Manufacturing breakthrough: Analysing the differential effect of digital transformation on continuous innovation capability in enterprises. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 37(1), 1–16.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Changes in the social architecture of business model in the perspective of the Industry 4.0 concept
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top