Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Policies
Instruction for Authors
1/2022 vol. 26
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Get citation
Gender Differences in the Impact of Worklife on Executives’ Psychological Health
Marcus Mueller 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Ph.D., Professor of Management, Sacred Heart University, Luxembourg
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-08-08
 
 
Management 2022;26(1):79-92
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2019-0085
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (48)
 
KEYWORDS
Leadership
Executives
Well-being
 
ABSTRACT
The Impact of Worklife on Executives’ Psychological Health Purpose: This is the first scientific research studying the impact of worklife factors on executives’ psychological health by gender. The study has a particular focus on the factors of ‘Community’ and ‘Work-life balance’. Design: Survey data were collected from N=481 senior executives to measure seven worklife factors and psychological health. Standardized regression analysis was performed for each worklife in a regression model predicting psychological health by gender. Findings: Results showed significant differences between female and male senior executives in the profiles of seven worklife factors in terms of their relationship with psychological health. ‘Work-life balance’ was the strongest predictor of female executives’ psychological health, ‘Values’ for male executives’ psychological health. ‘Community’ showed similar levels of association for both women and men. Originality/value: This research addresses the literature gap of large-scale, quantitative investigations into the psychology of senior executives. The results can be applied as a guide for organizational design, executive training and development programs accounting for differences by gender.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2007). Inner work life. Havard Business Review(May), 72-83.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Ashkanasy, N. M., & Jordan, P. (2008). A Multilevel view of leadership and emotion. In R. H. Humphrey (Ed.), Affect and emotion, new directions in management theory and research (pp. 17-39): Information Age Publishing.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Cameron, K. S. (2007). Forgiveness in organizations. In D. L. Nelson & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior (pp. 129-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Conti, J. A., & O’Neil, M. (2007). Studying power: Qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 63-82.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Cooper, C. L., & Marshall, J. (1978). Sources of managerial and white collar stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work. Chichester, UK: John Wiley, & Sons.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
DiRenzo, M. S., Greenhaus, J. H., & Weer, C. H. (2011). Job level, demands, and resources as antecendents of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78, 305-314.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Dollard, M. F., & Bailey, T. S. (2013). Australian Workplace Barometer: Psychological Safety Climate and working conditions in Australia: Australian Federation Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2008). Management research (Third ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
EU-OSHA. (2012). European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks (ESENER): Drivers and barriers of psychosocial risk management.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Gardiner, M., & Tiggemann, M. (1999). Gender differences in leadership style, job stress, and mental health in male- and female dominated industries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 301-315.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Hall, G. B., Dollard, M. F., & Coward, J. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate: Development of the PSC-12. International Journal of Stress Management.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executives sometimes lose it, just like the rest of us. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 503-508. Retrieved from ://WOS:000230129100003.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echolons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Hewlett, S. A. (2002). Executive women and the myth of having it all. Harvard Business Review, 80, 66-73.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Hurley, D., & Choudhary, A. (2016). Factors influencing attainment of CEO positions for women. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31(4), 250-265.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735-735-762. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
ILO. (2016). Psychosocial risks and work related stress. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/safework/ar....
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Jayanthi, B., & Vanniarajan, T. (2012). Work-life imbalance among executives: A gender focus. Global Management Review, 6, 793-819.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwartz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New york: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J. P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation of gender orientation at the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2014). Coaching the toxic leader: Four pathologies that can hobble an executive and bring misery to the workplace – and what to do about them. Harvard Business Review, 92(4), 100-109.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Kets De Vries, M. F. R., & Florent-Treacy, E. (2002). Global leadership from A to Z: Creating high commitment organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 30(4), 295-309. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/s....
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Kets De Vries, M. F. R., & Korotov, K. (2005). The future of an Illusion: In search of the new European business leader. Organizational Dynamics, 34(3), 218-230. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/s....
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (1999). Six areas of worklife: A model of the organizational context of burnout. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 21(4), 472-489.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Levinson, H. (1964/1985). Executive Stress. New York: New American Library.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Levinson, H. (2006). Harry Levinson on the psychology of leadership. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Loehr, J., & Schwartz, T. (2003). THe Power of full engagement. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Lynch, J. J. (2000). A cry unheard: The medical consequences of loneliness. Baltimore: Bancroft Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
McKinsey. (2017). Women in the workplace. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/globa....
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Mills, M. J., & Grotto, A. R. (2017). Who can have it all and how?: An empirical examination of gender and work-life considerations among senior executives. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 32(2), 82-97.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Mueller, M., & Lovell, G. (2018). Gender differences in the psychology of senior executives: Is it different at the top? Management and Economics Research Journal, 4(4), 289-304.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Myakowsky, L., Unikel, E., & Dew, M. A. (2005). Effects of gender diversity on performance and interpersonal behavior in small work groups. Sex Roles, 52, 645-657.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
O’Brien, K. R., Martinez, L. R., Ruggs, E. N., Rinehard, J., & Hebl, M. R. (2015). Policies that make a difference bridging the gender equity and work-family gap in academia. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(5), 414-426.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Quick, J. C., Mack, D. A., Gavin, J. H., Cooper, C. L., & Quick, J. D. (2004). Executives: Engines for positive stress. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research into Occupational Stress and Well-being (pp. 359-405). New York: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Quick, J. C., & Quick, J. D. (2013). Executive well-being. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Happiness (pp. 798-810). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Quick, J. C., Wright, T. A., Adkins, J. A., Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. D. (2013). Preventive stress management in organizations (2nd ed.). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Reuters. (2013). Corporate suicides highlight stresses at the top. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article....
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529-565.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
SafeWorkAustralia. (2012). The Australian workplace barometer: Report on psychosocial safety climate and worker health in Australia.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Schiebinger, L., & Gilmartin, S. (2010). Housework is an academic issue. Academe, 96(1), 39-44.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
SeniorExecutiveService. (2012). Executive Core Qualifications. Retrieved from http://www.opm.gov/ses/recruit....
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
TheGallupOrganization. (1992-1999). Gallup Workplace Audit. Washington, DC: US Copyright Office.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678-691.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Wegge, J., Roth, C., Neubach, B., Schmidt, K. L., & Kanfer, R. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1301-1313.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top