SCIENCE ARTICLE
Enhancing Digital Marketing Through Optimized CRM Selection: A Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Perspective
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Economics, Ho Chi Minh city University of Technology and Education University, Vietnam, Viet Nam
Submission date: 2025-10-29
Final revision date: 2025-12-15
Acceptance date: 2026-01-09
Online publication date: 2026-02-25
Publication date: 2026-02-25
Corresponding author
Huy Nguyen Anh Phan
Faculty of Economics, Ho Chi Minh city University of Technology and Education University, Vietnam, Viet Nam
Management 2025;(2):752-780
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose:
Selecting an appropriate CRM platform
is a critical yet complex decision for organizations aiming to optimize digital
marketing effectiveness. This complexity arises from diverse functional
requirements, cost considerations, and market uncertainty. The purpose of
this research is to provide a systematic, objective method for evaluating
CRM alternatives to mitigate the risks of manual or biased selection
processes.
Design/methodology/approach:
The study introduces an integrated
multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. It combines Fuzzy Analytic
Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP), used to determine the relative importance of
evaluation criteria, with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to
Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), which ranks the alternatives. The methodology was
validated through a real-world case study at Test Mentor Co., Ltd., involving
a sensitivity analysis across 45 different scenarios to ensure results were
robust
Findings:
The results identify HubSpot CRM as the most suitable platform for
the case study, followed by Zoho CRM and Salesforce CRM, while Microsoft
Dynamics CRM ranked the lowest. Additionally, the study reveals that
subscription cost and reporting capabilities are the most influential criteria
driving the selection process in this context.
Value added and limitations:
This research adds value by offering a datadriven,
repeatable framework that transforms qualitative requirements into
quantitative rankings, providing actionable insights for businesses. While the
sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of the findings for the specific
case study, a primary limitation is that the rankings may shift based on the
unique strategic priorities or budget constraints of different organizational
environments.
REFERENCES (44)
1.
Adebanjo, D. (2003). Classifying and selecting e-CRM applications: An analysis-based proposal. Management Decision, 41(6), 570–577.
https://doi.org/10.1108/002517....
2.
Aguaron, J., Escobar, M. T., & Jimenez, J. M. (2003). Consistency stability intervals for a judgment in AHP decision support system. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(2), 382–393.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-....
3.
Al Jafa, H. (2020). A case study for the CRM software selection process in a transportation company using an integrated AHP and QFD approach. SEA - Practical Application of Science, 24, 337–351.
4.
Alshawi, S., Missi, F., & Irani, Z. (2011). Organisational, technical and data quality factors in CRM adoption — SMEs perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 376–383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indm....
5.
Ayda, E. D., Prisa, B., & Mohammad, F. (2017). An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach for ranking and selecting the chief inspectors of bank: A case study. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 8–23.
https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie....
6.
Battor, M., & Battor, M. (2010). The impact of customer relationship management capability on innovation and performance advantages: Testing a mediated model. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(9–10), 842–857.
https://doi.org/10.1080/026725....
8.
Chang, H. H. (2007). Critical factors and benefits in the implementation of customer relationship management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(5), 483–508.
https://doi.org/10.1080/147833....
9.
Chou, Y.-C., Yen, H.-Y., Dang, V. L., & Sun, C.-C. (2019). Assessing the human resource in science and technology for Asian countries: Application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Symmetry, 11(2), 251.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym110....
10.
Choudhary, D., & Shankar, R. (2012). An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(2), 362–376.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....
11.
Contreras-Masse, R., Ochoa-Zezzatti, A., García, V., Pérez-Dominguez, L., & Elizondo-Cortés, M. (2020). Implementing a novel use of multicriteria decision analysis to select IIoT platforms for smart manufacturing. Symmetry, 12(3), 368.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym120....
12.
Cricelli, L., Grimaldi, M., & Hanandi, M. (2014). Decision making in choosing information systems: An empirical study in Jordan. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 44(2), 162–184.
https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-0....
13.
Cruz-Jesus, F., Pinheiro, A., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Understanding CRM adoption stages: Empirical analysis building on the TOE framework. Computers in Industry, 109, 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
14.
Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21(3), 215–231.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-....
15.
Farhan, M. S., Abed, A. A., & Ellatif, M. A. (2018). A systematic review for the determination and classification of the CRM critical success factors supporting with their metrics. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 3(2), 133–149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcij....
16.
Friedrich, I., & Breitner, M. H. (2012). Towards a process model for efficient customer relationship management system selection. In D. C. Mattfeld & S. Robra-Bissantz (Eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012: Tagungsband der MKWI 2012 (pp. 45–57). Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Technische Universität Braunschweig.
http://www.digibib.tu-bs.de/?d....
17.
Goldenberg, B. (1991). Analyze key factors when choosing software. Marketing News, 25(20), 12–13.
18.
Gungor, Z., Serhadlıoglu, G., & Kesen, S. E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 641–646.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc....
19.
Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., & Agouti, T. (2016). Application of an integrated multicriteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. Springer Plus, 5, 263.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064....
20.
Hong, T., & Kim, E. (2007). The selection of CRM systems in financial institutes using the analytic hierarchy process. In 2007 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM) (pp. 399–404). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.....
21.
Hsieh, T.-Y., Lu, S.-T., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 573–584.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpr....
23.
Isiklar, G., & Buyukozkan, G. (2006). Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 29(2), 265–274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.....
24.
Jadhav, A. S., & Sonar, R. M. (2011). Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: A hybrid knowledge based system approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(8), 1394–1407.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.....
25.
Kalakota, R., & Robinson, M. (2001). E-business 2.0: Roadmap for success (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
26.
Karlsson, J., Wohlin, C., & Regnell, B. (1998). An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements. Information and Software Technology, 39(14–15), 939–947.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-....
27.
Kincaid, J. W. (2003). Customer relationship management: Getting it right!. Prentice Hall.
28.
Li, Y. H., Huang, J. W., & Song, M. (2019). Examining business value of customer relationship management systems: IT usage and two-stage model perspectives. Information & Management, 56(3), 392–402.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2....
29.
Lien, C. Y., & Liang, K. L. (2005). An ERP system selection model with project management viewpoint - A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. International Journal of the Information Systems for Logistics and Management, 1(1), 39–46.
30.
Lim, W. M., Ariffin, S. K., Ali, F., & Chang, Y. W. (2021). A hybrid MCDM model for live-streamer selection via the fuzzy Delphi method, AHP, and TOPSIS. Applied Sciences, 11(19), 9322.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app111....
31.
Lin, C. T., & Yang, Y. C. (1996). Evaluation of machine selection by the AHP method. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 57(3–4), 253–258.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0....
33.
Muradi, S. B. (2023). Systematic selection of blockchain platforms using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 36(2), 99–123.
https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.....
34.
Nguyen, B., & Mutum, D. S. (2012). A review of customer relationship management: Successes, advances, pitfalls and futures. Business Process Management Journal, 18(3), 400–419.
https://doi.org/10.1108/146371....
35.
Onut, S., & Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28(9), 1552–1559.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasm....
36.
Oyekola, O., & Xu, L. (2020). Selecting SaaS CRM solution for SMEs. In ICIST 2020: 10th International Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 1–9). ACM.
https://doi.org/10.1145/344756....
37.
Piya, S., [et al.]. (2022). Integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method to analyze green management practice in hospitality industry in the Sultanate of Oman. Sustainability, 14(3), 1118.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1403....
38.
Prakash, C., & Barua, M. K. (2015). Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37(3), 599–615.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy....
39.
Rajak, M., & Sabharwal, S. (2019). Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Technology in Society, 59, 101186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
40.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2....
41.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI....
42.
Sun, C.-C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7745–7754.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa....
43.
Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., Deakins, E., Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to supply partner selection in continuous aid humanitarian supply chains. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1–2), 1517–1550.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479....