The socio-economic approach to the study of main economic systems. Socialism and capitalism. Part 1.
 
More details
Hide details
1
1Tyumen State University, Tiumen, Russia
 
2
2Ph.D. Poznan University of Economics and Business, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
 
 
Online publication date: 2018-06-26
 
 
Management 2018;22(1):238-250
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The socio-economic approach to the study of main economic systems. Socialism and capitalism. Part 1. Society is explored with the help of various approaches and methods that allow us to analyze the economy, politics, culture and society. Society as a socio-economic system can be effectively studied from the standpoint of the socio-economic approach, which is implemented within the framework of the formational approach. It was formerly used e.g. by Daniel Bell, John Kenneth Galbraith, Karl Marx, Leonid Weger, Yoshihiro Francis Fukuyama, Erik Olin Wright, and Immanuel Maurice Wallerstein. Formational approach allows us to analyze the global social and economic systems of the 20th century: capitalism and socialism. From the standpoint of this approach, the main difference between capitalism and socialism is the presence or absence of private ownership of the means of production. This feature has an impact on all aspects of social life in these systems. During the existence of these global systems, we have accumulated a rich experience of development in all areas of social life, which is analyzed in this article. The proposed article considers the positive and negative aspects of the development of capitalism and socialism. The directions of development of social and economic systems towards new form of capitalism are described and analyzed.
 
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Barska A., Jędrzejczak-Gas J. (2016), The concept for the development of a functional area illustrated by the case of the functional area of the oder communes, “Economics and Management”, Vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 25-34.
 
2.
Le Bon G. (2001), The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, Batoche Books, Kitchener, p. 129.
 
3.
Chumakov V.Yu. (2011), Пять поколений металлургов России, ZAO Bizneskom, Moscow, p. 272.
 
4.
Czyżewski B., Majchrzak A. (2017), Market versus agriculture in Poland - macroeconomic relations of incomes, prices and productivity in terms of the sustainable development paradigm, “Technological and Economic Development of Economy”, Vol. 23, pp. 1-17, https://doi.org/10.3846/202949....
 
5.
Dahrendorf R. (1997), After 1989: Morals, Revolution and Civil Society, Palgrave Macmillan UK, Basingstoke, p. 179.
 
6.
Davydenko V., Arbitailo I. (2016), Inequality in the sphere of health: the case of Russia, „Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego w Zielonej Górze, Nierówności Społeczne a Rozwój Gospodarczy”, No. 4, pp. 26-41.
 
7.
Davies N. (1999), Boże Igrzysko, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
 
8.
Drucker P.F. (2013), The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society, Elsevier, London, pp. 380.
 
9.
Drucker P.F. (2011), The End of Economic Man: The Origins of Totalitarianism, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, London, p. 276.
 
10.
Durkheim E. (1997), The Division of Labor in Society, Free Press, New York, p. 352.
 
11.
Fic M., Wyrwa J. (2004), Koncepcje zawodności państwa, “Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy”, Vol. 4, pp. 217-225.
 
12.
Fiedor B. (2010), Kryzys gospodarczy a kryzys ekonomii jako nauki, „Ekonomista”, Vol. 4, pp. 453-466.
 
13.
Galbraith J.K. (1967), The New Industrial State, Houghton Miffl in, New York.
 
14.
Gavlin M.L. (2002), Из истории российского предпринимательства: Династия Строгановых. Научно-аналитический обзор, INION RAN, Moscow.
 
15.
Grot Z. (2000), Hipolit Cegielski, Wydawnictwo Miejskie, Poznań.
 
16.
Harrison L.E., Huntington S.P. (eds), (2000), Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, Basic Books, New York, p. 348.
 
17.
Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programs http://hdr.undp.org/en/content... (10.1.2018 - access date).
 
18.
Huntington S.P. (2012), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
 
19.
Jaźwiński I. (2011), The Scope of Functions and Strength of Institutions in Economic Policy of the EU Member States from Central and Eastern Europe. Conception of Analysis, “Economics”, Vol. 90 (1).
 
20.
Jezierski A. (2003), Historia Gospodarcza Polski, Key Text Wydawnictwo, Warsaw, p. 568.
 
21.
Kaźmierczyk J. (2011), Grzechy ekonomii, czyli trzynaście problemów w rozważaniach ekonomistów (esej), „Zeszyty Naukowe, Ostrołęckie Towarzystwo Naukowe im. Adama Chętnika”, XXV, pp. 393-406.
 
22.
Kaźmierczyk J. (2015), Konsensus Poznański i Konsensus Azjatycki - jak daleko do Konsensusu Waszyngtońskiego? Analiza porównawcza. Pierwsze spostrzeżenia, [in:] Pietraszkiewicz K. (ed.), Sektor fi nansowy: stymulatory i zagrożenia rozwoju, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa, pp. 222-239.
 
23.
Kovalevsky M.M. (2010), Избранные труды, Российская политическая энциклопедия, Moscow, pp. 576.
 
24.
Marx K. (1970), Critique of the Gotha Program, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
 
25.
Mason P. (2009), Meltdown: The End of the Age of Greed, Verso, London, p.198.
 
26.
Mason P. (2015), Post Capitalism: A Guide to Our Future, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, p. 368.
 
27.
McNally C.A. (2012), Sino-Capitalism: China’s Reemergence and the International Political Economy, “World Politics”, 64(4), pp. 741-776.
 
28.
Parsons T. (2013), Social System, Routledge, London, p. 404.
 
29.
Potkina I.V. (2004), Олимпе делового успеха: Никольская мануфактура Морозовых. 1797, Moscow, p. 231.
 
30.
Ricardo D. (2001), The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Batoche Books, Kitchener, p. 333.
 
31.
Ritzer G. (2012), The McDonaldization of Society, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, London, p. 280.
 
32.
Robertson R. (1992), Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, p. 211.
 
33.
Roszkowski W. (2009), Historia Polski 1914-2005, PWN, Warszawa.
 
34.
Shleifer A., Treisman D. (2005), A Normal Country: Russia After Communism, “Journal of Economic Perspectives”, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 151-174.
 
35.
Smith A. (2012), Bogactwo narodów, Studio EMKA, Warsaw, p. 124.
 
36.
Smith A. (1989), Teoria uczuć moralnych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw, p. 546.
 
37.
Spengler O. (1991), The Decline of the West, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 414.
 
38.
Stiglitz J.E. (2006), Making Globalization Work, W.W. Norton, New York, London, p. 397.
 
39.
Stiglitz J.E. (2012), The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, p. 414.
 
40.
Skrzydło L. (2000), Rody fabrykanckie, Ofi cyna Bibliofi lów, Łódź, p. 116.
 
41.
Szarzec K. (2013), Państwo w gospodarce. Studium teoretyczne - od Adama Smitha do współczesności, WN PWN, Warszawa.
 
42.
The World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/indi... (10.1.2018 - access date).
 
43.
Toffl er A. (1980), The third wave, Pan Books, London, p. 543.
 
44.
Toffl er A. (1971), Future Shock, Pan Books, London, p. 517.
 
45.
Voronov V. (2016), Дифференциация социальных групп в современном обществе по доходам: региональный аспект, “Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego w Zielonej Górze, Nierówności Społeczne a Rozwój Gospodarczy”, No. 4, pp. 276-287.
 
46.
Wallerstein I. (1999), The End of the World as We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
 
47.
Weinstein A.L. (1969), Народный доход России и СССР: история, методология, исчисления, динамика, Nauka, Moscow.
 
48.
Werth N. (1992), История советского государства. 1900-1991, Прогресс-Академия, Moscow, p. 480.
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top