SCIENCE ARTICLE
Leader vs team member - Differences in equality and hierarchical individualism and collectivism - the context of public and private organisations
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Management Faculty, Gdansk University, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2024-04-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-09-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-10-31
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-11-27
 
 
Publication date: 2024-11-27
 
 
Corresponding author
Dorota Jendza   

Management Faculty, Gdansk University, Bażyńskiego, 80-309, Gdansk, Poland
 
 
Management 2024;28(2):185-205
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
M540
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study presented here is to identify differences in levels of individualism and equality collectivism and hierarchical individualism depending on the type of organisation and the organisational role performed. A total of 810 people took part in the study, representing organisations in the public and private sectors with different organisational roles. Participants answered questions on the scale on individualism and collectivism of equality and hierarchy (KIRH), constructed based on Singelis and Triandis' (1995) concept. The survey was conducted in May 2023 in Polish private and public organisations. A two-factor analysis of variance was used to determine differences in the level of hierarchical and equalitarian individualism and collectivism according to organisation type and organisational role in the research design of organisation type (public vs. private) x organisational role (managerial vs. employee). The research shows that the level of equality collectivism varies according to organisational role. It is higher among managers than among team members. The level of hierarchical collectivism varies according to the type of organisation and role. It is higher among team leaders in public organisations. No significant differences were found in the level of equality and hierarchical individualism between public and private organisations, as well as between managers and team members. The study confirms the existence of cultural differences between the public and private sectors and between managers and team members. The study highlights that the individual personality traits of team leaders may be as important in shaping employee behaviour as the type of organisation. The study is a pilot study.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Abraham, R. (1997). The relationship of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism to intrapreneurship and organizational commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 18(4),. 179-186. DOI: org/10.1108/01437739710182278.
 
2.
Adamska, K., Retowski, S., & Konarski, R. (2005). KIRH - a questionnaire for the study of equality and hierarchical collectivism and individualism. Psychological Journal, 11 (2), 180-181.
 
3.
Akyurek, S.S., & Can, O. (2022). Illegitimate tasks and occupational outcomes: the impact of vertical collectivism. Evidence-based HRM, 10(2), 155-173. DOI: org/10.1108/EBHRM-02-2021-0025.
 
4.
Alicke, M.D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In: M.D. Alicke, D.A. Dunning, J.I. Kruger (eds.) The self in social judgment (pp. 85-96). Psychology Press.
 
5.
Arieli, S., & Sagiv, L. (2018). Culture and problem-solving: Congruency between the cultural mindset of individualism versus collectivism and problem type. Journal of Experimental Psychology, No. 147, 792-810. DOI:10.1037/xge0000444.
 
6.
Czerniawska, M. (2020). Horizontal and vertical ‘individualism -collectivism’ and values. Culture-Society-Education, 2(18), 293-309.
 
7.
Chen, S., Lee Chai, A.Y., & Bargh, J.A.. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187. DOI: org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173.
 
8.
Fiske, A.P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures: A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs. Comment on Oyserman et al Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 128, 78 - 88. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.78.
 
9.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9, 42- 63. DOI: org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3.
 
10.
Hofstede, G. (2000). Cultures and organisations. PWE.
 
11.
Hwang, A., Francesco, A.M., & Kessler, E. (2003). The relationship between individualism - collectivism, face, and feedback and learning processes in Hong Kong, Singapore, and The United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, No. 34, 72-92. DOI: org/10.1177/0022022102239156.
 
12.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Anderson, C. (2003), Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265.
 
13.
Kettl, D.F. (2006). Managing Boundaries in American Administration: the Collaboration Imperative. Public Administration Review , Vol. 66, 10-19. DOI: org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00662.x.
 
14.
Kim, S. (2009). Testing the Structure of Public Service Motivation in Korea: A Research Note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 839-51. DOI: org/10.1093/jopart/mup019.
 
15.
Kim, S. (2011). Testing a Revised Measure of Public Service Motivation: Reflective Versus Formative Specification. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 521-546. DOI: org/10.1093/jopart/muq048.
 
16.
Komarraju, M., Dollinger, S.J., & Lovell, J.L. (2008). Individualism-collectivism in horizontal and vertical directions as predictors of conflict management styles, International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(1), 20-35. DOI: org/10.1108/10444060810849164.
 
17.
Lee, S.-B, Liu, S.-H., Maertz, C.P., Singh, N. & Fisher, J. (2023). A mechanism for employees’ brand citizenship behavior (BCB) and negative wordof- mouth (NWOM): The divergent moderating effects of horizontal collectivism. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(7), 1123-1138. DOI: org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2022-4047.
 
18.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98. DOI: org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
 
19.
Mead, R., & Andrews, T.G. (2011). International management. Wolters Kluwer Business.
 
20.
Nisbett, R.E. (2015). The geography of thinking. Why eastern and western people think differently. Taste of Words, 55-63.
 
21.
Nutt, P.C., & Backoff, R.W. (1993). Organizational Publicness and Its Implications for Strategic Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(2), 209-231. DOI: org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037167.
 
22.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72. DOI: org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3.
 
23.
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S.W.S. (2008). Does Culture Influence What and How We Think? Effects of Priming Individualism and Collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (2), 311-342. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311.
 
24.
Rahman, S., & Luomala, H. (2021). Demystifying Horizontal/Vertical Cultural Difference in Green Consumption: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33(5), 543-558. DOI: org/10.1080/08961530.2020.1857669.
 
25.
Rakowska A., Sitko-Lutek A. (2000). Doskonalenie kompetencji menedzerskich. Warsaw: PWN.
 
26.
Reykowski, J. (1992). Collectivism and individualism as categories for describing social change and mentality. Psychological Review, 35, 147-170.
 
27.
Robert, C., & Wasti, S.A.. (2002). Organizational Individualism and Collectivism: Theoretical Development and an Empirical Test of a Measure. Journal of Management, 25(2), 544-566. DOI: org/10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00143-5.
 
28.
Rutka, R., & Czerska, M. (2014). Ewolucja nastawień kadry kierowniczej w latach 1984–2013. In: P. Wachowiak, & S. Winch (Eds.). Granice w zarządzaniu kapitałem ludzkim, (pp. 285-297). Warsaw: SGH.
 
29.
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism- collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139 -157. DOI: org/10.1177/0022022190212001.
 
30.
Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D.P.S., & Gelfand, M.J. (1995).Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29 (3),240-275.
 
31.
Smith, P.K., Jostmann, M.B., Galinsky, A.D., & van Dijk, W.W. (2008).Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 441-447. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02107.x.
 
32.
Sułkowski, Ł. (2002). Kulturowa zmienność organizacji. PWE, Warsaw: PWE.
 
33.
Taras, V., Sarala, R., Muchinsky, P., Kemmelmeier, M., Singelis, T.M., Avsec, A., & Sinclair, H C. (2014). Opposite ends of the same stick? A multi-method test of the dimensionality of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 213-245. DOI: org/10.1177/0022022113509132.
 
34.
Triandis, H.C. (1995). New directions in social psychology. Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
 
35.
Triandis, H.C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 907-924. DOI: org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169.
 
36.
Triandis, H.C.. (1989). The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520. DOI: org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506.
 
37.
Utz, S. (2004). Self -construal and cooperation: is the interdependent self more cooperative than independent self? Self and Identity, 3, 177-190. DOI: org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110878.
 
38.
Wagner, J.A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. The Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-172. DOI: org/10.5465/256731.
 
39.
Wolniak, R. (2008). Individualism and collectivism on the example of public organisations in the Silesian province. Organisation and Management, 67-81.
 
40.
Wong, Y.J., Wang S.Y., & Klann E.M. (2018). The Emperor With No Clothes: A Critique of Collectivism and Individualism. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6, 251-260. DOI: org/10.1037/arc0000059.
 
41.
Vezeteu, V., & Verboncu, I. (2020). Management of Public and Private Organizations, Comparative Approach. Revista de management comparat international/review of international comparative management. Academy of Economic Studies, 21(4), 577-591.
 
42.
Yu, M. (2014). Examining the effect of individualism and collectivism on knowledge sharing intention: An examination of tacit knowledge as moderator. Chinese Management Studies, 8(1), 149-166. DOI: org/10.1108/CMS-06-2011-0037.
 
43.
Xiang, Y., Shuhong, W. Junhua, D., & Lei, W. (2012). The Role of Individualism-Collectivism in the Individual Creative Process. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 296-303. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2012.730001.
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top